Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40791200›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025

Social support and quality of life in Chinese heart transplant recipients: mediation through uncertainty in illness and moderation by psychological resilience.

Chan Gao, Song Gui, Lijun Zhu, Xiaoqian Bian, Heyong Shen, Can Jiao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chan GaoSchool of Psychology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Song GuiSchool of Psychology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Lijun ZhuSchool of Psychology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Xiaoqian BianInstitute of Analytical Psychology, City university of Macau, Macau, China.
Heyong ShenInstitute of Analytical Psychology, City university of Macau, Macau, China.
Can JiaoSchool of Psychology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In China's collectivist healthcare context, the mechanisms linking social support to quality of life (QoL) in heart transplant recipients remain unclear. This study integrates Mishel's uncertainty in illness theory and Confucian resilience frameworks to cross-sectionally examine dual pathways: direct enhancement of QoL through social support and indirect reduction of uncertainty in illness, moderated by culturally embedded psychological resilience. Methods: A nationwide cross-sectional study included 428 Chinese heart transplant recipients. Social support (SSRS), uncertainty in illness (MUIS-A), resilience (CD-RISC), and QoL (SF-36) were assessed. Mediation (PROCESS Model 4) and moderated mediation (Model 14) were tested using 5,000 bootstrap resamples, controlling for age, gender, and transplant duration. Results: Social support directly improved QoL ( Conclusion: Based on this cross-sectional study, social support demonstrates significant associations with dual pathways: directly associated with improved QoL through relational support networks and indirectly linked to reduced uncertainty in illness via culturally mediated cognitive reframing. Culturally interventions integrating family-centered care and resilience training are recommended to improve long-term outcomes.

Indexed as

heart transplantationmoderated mediation modelpsychological resiliencequality of lifesocial supportuncertainty in illness

Identifiers

PMID40791200
PMCPMC12338042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.