ArticleActa oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)2025
Telemedicine follow-up for pre-malignant and malignant glottic lesions: a randomised controlled trial study protocol comparing care close to home versus standard of care.
Article in Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The influence of urban versus rural residence and travel distance on net income, out-of-pocket payments and quality of life in German head and neck cancer survivors.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeIn the Netherlands, care for head and neck cancer (HNC) is centralised in head and neck oncology centres (HNOCs). Follow-up after treatment requires frequent visits that can burden patients and providers. Telemedicine, through remote evaluation of laryngopharyngoscopy videos recorded at local hospitals, may offer a feasible alternative. This study protocol describes the aim to assess patient satisfaction and safety with telemedicine follow-up after treatment of (pre-)malignant glottic lesions, including severe dysplasia, carcinoma-in-situ and T1 squamous cell carcinoma, conducted at one HNOC and participating general hospitals. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: As a non-blinded, randomised controlled trial, 90 patients with a one-way travel time by car of over 45 min to the HNOC will be allocated to the intervention group (follow-up by an Ear, Nose and Throat surgeon at a nearby participating hospital) or the control group (standard follow-up at the HNOC). All patients undergo guideline-based care. In the intervention group, laryngopharyngoscopy recordings will be remotely reviewed by HNOC specialists on the same day. Surveys will be fulfilled at baseline, 6 and 12 months. The primary outcome is overall patient satisfaction using a 0-10 numeric rating scale at 12 months follow-up. Secondary outcomes are safety, quality of life, fear of recurrence, travel time and carbon-dioxide emission. Safety will be assessed through recurrence, complications, re-referral and survival. Between-group and within-group comparisons will be performed to evaluate differences in outcomes, using appropriate statistical methods based on data distribution. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study explores regional collaboration and sustainable follow-up for HNC patients. The ethics board approved the protocol (M23.325004). The authors commit to publishing the findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.