ReviewJournal of chemical information and modeling2025
RiSKs in Computational Modeling of Isoform-Selective RSK Inhibitors.
Review in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent developments around inhibitors of the 90 kDa ribosomal S6 serine/threonine kinases (RSK1-4) have been focused on the optimization of known pan-RSK inhibitors such as SL0101 and BI-D1870. The RSKs are an intriguing target for cancer therapy due to their role as downstream effectors in the MAPK pathway. Herein, we focus on the utilization of computational modeling in inhibitor screening and development for RSK, and we examine computational artifacts in molecular modeling, quantum mechanical calculations, molecular dynamics, and high throughput screening. Variation between RSK structural models is also evident, given the available crystal structures, and liberties in homology modeling and dynamic conformations may capture new targeting approaches for these proteins. Furthermore, pan-kinase inhibitors are often used to target RSK since the four different RSK isoforms share a high degree of homology; however, they have distinct biological actions in cancer. A majority of RSK modeling generalizes the conclusions from one isoform onto the others; therefore, forming accurate isoform specific models containing their subtle differences will be key to the development of isoform-selective inhibitors. This review consolidates existing RSK models and the isoform specific structural differences that have and have not been considered, evaluates inhibition studies that have started to build upon RSK selectivity, including for its isoforms, and assesses other inhibitory binding sites to offer potential pathways forward. The leveraging of these differences through computational methods aims to guide next-generation isoform-selective RSK inhibitors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.