Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40791107›Full record

ArticleDiagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey)2026

Comparative analysis of tumor and mesorectum radiomics in predicting neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy response in locally advanced rectal cancer.

Ali Cantürk, Raif Can Yarol, Ali Samet Tasak, Hakan Gülmez, Kenan Kadirli, Tayfun Bişgin, Berke Manoğlu, Selman Sökmen, İlhan Öztop, İlknur Görken Bilkay and 3 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ali CantürkUniversity of Health Sciences Türkiye, Sultan 2. Abdülhamid Han Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Radiology, İstanbul, TürkiyeORCID 0000-0001-6145-7029
Raif Can YarolDokuz Eylül University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiology, İzmir, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-2007-224X
Ali Samet TasakMinistry of Health, Department of Radiology, Ağrı, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-2839-1520
Hakan GülmezUniversity of Health Sciences Türkiye, Sultan 2. Abdülhamid Han Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Radiology, İstanbul, TürkiyeORCID 0000-0001-5467-3743
Kenan KadirliDokuz Eylül University Faculty of Medicine, Department of General Surgery, İzmir, TürkiyeORCID 0000-0001-6604-4602
Tayfun BişginDokuz Eylül University Faculty of Medicine, Department of General Surgery, İzmir, TürkiyeORCID 0000-0001-7040-4228
Berke ManoğluDokuz Eylül University Faculty of Medicine, Department of General Surgery, İzmir, TürkiyeORCID 0000-0003-4755-2200
Selman SökmenDokuz Eylül University Faculty of Medicine, Department of General Surgery, İzmir, TürkiyeORCID 0000-0001-8235-7246
İlhan ÖztopDokuz Eylül University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, İzmir, TürkiyeORCID 0000-0002-0425-0651
İlknur Görken BilkayDokuz Eylül University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, İzmir, TürkiyeORCID 0000-0002-0010-0154
Özgül SağolDokuz Eylül University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pathology, İzmir, TürkiyeORCID 0000-0001-9136-5635
Sülen SarıoğluMemorial Şişli Hospital, Clinic of Pathology, İstanbul, TürkiyeORCID 0000-0003-4877-3064
Funda BarlıkDokuz Eylül University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiology, İzmir, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-5615-8251

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNeoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is known to increase sphincter preservation rates and decrease the risk of postoperative recurrence in patients with locally advanced rectal tumors. However, the response to CRT in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) varies significantly. The objective of this study was to compare the performance of models based on radiomics features of the tumor alone, the mesorectum alone, and a combination of both in predicting tumor response to neoadjuvant CRT in LARC.

methodsThis retrospective study included 101 patients with LARC. Patients were categorized as responders (modified Ryan score 0-1) and non-responders (modified Ryan score 2-3). Pre-CRT magnetic resonance imaging evaluations included tumor-T2 weighted imaging (T2WI), tumor-diffusion weighted imaging (DWI), tumor-apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps, and mesorectum-T2WI. The first radiologist segmented the tumor and mesorectum from T2-weighted images, and the second radiologist performed tumor segmentation using DWI and ADC maps. Feature reproducibility was assessed by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) using a two-way mixed-effects model with absolute agreement for single measurements [ICC(3,1)]. Radiomic features with ICC values <0.60 were excluded from further analysis. Subsequently, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method was applied to select the most relevant radiomic features. The top five features with the highest coefficients were selected for model training. To address class imbalance between groups, the synthetic minority over-sampling technique was applied exclusively to the training folds during cross-validation. Thereafter, classification learner models were developed using 10-fold cross-validation to achieve the highest performance. The performance metrics of the final models, including accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), were calculated to evaluate the classification performance.

resultsAmong the 101 patients, 36 were classified as responders and 65 as non-responders. A total of 25 radiomic features from the tumor and 20 from the mesorectum were found to be statistically significant (

conclusionRadiomic features derived from both the tumor and mesorectum demonstrated complementary prognostic value in predicting treatment response. The inclusion of mesorectal features substantially improved model performance, with the combined model achieving the highest AUC value. These findings highlight the added predictive contribution of the mesorectum as a key peritumoral structure in radiomics-based assessment. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Currently, the response of locally advanced rectal tumors to neoadjuvant therapy cannot be reliably predicted using conventional methods. Recently, the significance of the mesorectum in predicting treatment response has gained attention, although the number of studies focusing on this area remains limited. In our study, we performed radiomics analyses of both the tumor tissue and the mesorectum to predict neoadjuvant treatment response.

Indexed as

ChemoradiotherapyNeoadjuvant TherapyRadiomicsRectal NeoplasmsAdultAgedDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRectumReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesArtificial intelligencelocally advanced rectal cancermagnetic resonance imagingneoadjuvant treatmentradiomics

Identifiers

PMID40791107
PMCPMC13320299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.