Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40791098›Full record

ArticleBrain and behavior2025

Insights Into the Association Between Stroke and Sarcopenia Risk in Adults Aged ≥ 50 Years: Cross-Sectional Evidence From Two Large Population Longitudinal Cohorts.

Xin Wang, Jie Zhang, Jing Xu, Ting Li, Qing Ye

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xin WangCenter For Rehabilitation Medicine, Rehabilitation & Sports Medicine Research Institute of Zhejiang Province, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital), Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Jie ZhangCenter For Rehabilitation Medicine, Rehabilitation & Sports Medicine Research Institute of Zhejiang Province, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital), Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1397-5224
Jing XuCenter For Rehabilitation Medicine, Rehabilitation & Sports Medicine Research Institute of Zhejiang Province, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital), Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Ting LiCenter For Rehabilitation Medicine, Rehabilitation & Sports Medicine Research Institute of Zhejiang Province, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital), Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Qing YeCenter For Rehabilitation Medicine, Rehabilitation & Sports Medicine Research Institute of Zhejiang Province, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital), Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1239-8086

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimEvidence has already shown that sarcopenia is linked to an elevated risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, the association between stroke and sarcopenia risk remains underexplored in stroke and non-stroke populations. This study investigated the stroke-sarcopenia relationship.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional analysis using data from Wave 3 (2015-2016) of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) and Wave 14 (2018-2019) of the Health and Retirement Study (HRS), focusing on ≥ 50 years adults. Missing data were imputed using the Python miceforest package with a random forest algorithm. All types of stroke were identified via self-reported records where individuals had received a confirmed diagnosis from a physician. Sarcopenia status was evaluated using muscle strength (evaluated with grip strength in CHARLS and HRS), muscle mass (evaluated with appendicular skeletal muscle), and physical performance (evaluated with gait speed, the five-repetition chair test, and the short physical performance battery). Logistic regression models estimated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the primary analysis, with generalized estimating equation (GEE) models employed in sensitivity analyses to ensure result robustness.

resultsThe study comprised 16,859 participants from CHARLS (51% female, mean age 62.9 years) and 16,692 from HRS (41% female, mean age 67.6 years). In CHARLS, stroke was associated with significantly increased risks of possible sarcopenia (OR: 2.07, 95% CI: 1.49-2.99), sarcopenia (OR: 1.93, 95% CI: 1.23-3.06), and severe sarcopenia (OR: 3.42, 95% CI: 2.22-5.34). In HRS, stroke was linked to elevated risks of possible sarcopenia (OR: 3.11, 95% CI: 2.75-3.52) and severe sarcopenia (OR: 2.20, 95% CI: 1.24-3.65). Self-care ability, nutritional status, and inflammatory factors were identified as key mediators, with findings remaining consistent across subgroups and sensitivity analyses.

conclusionsStroke was associated with increased risk for sarcopenia and its severe forms in adults aged ≥ 50 years. We recommend sarcopenia risk evaluation in poststroke patients with accessible tools, also emphasizing that functional rehabilitation, nutritional optimization, and inflammation control hold promise to alleviate sarcopenia risk and enhance long-term outcomes.

Indexed as

SarcopeniaStrokeAgedAged, 80 and overChinaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHand StrengthHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedMuscle, SkeletalMuscle StrengthRisk FactorsCHARLScross‐sectional studyHRSsarcopeniastroke

Identifiers

PMID40791098
PMCPMC12340430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.