Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40791002›Full record

ReviewAsian journal of andrology2026

Unraveling sperm kinematic heterogeneity with machine learning.

Andrés Aragón-Martínez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Asian journal of andrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Andrés Aragón-MartínezLaboratory of Gamete and Technology Development, Biomedicine Unit, Faculty of Superior Studies Iztacala, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Tlalnepantla, Mexico State, CP 54090, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The management of data from computer-aided sperm analysis (CASA) systems is crucial for understanding sperm motility. CASA systems generate motility parameters derived from tracking individual sperm cells, producing raw data as spermatozoa coordinates, which form the basis for sperm trajectory construction. These parameters and trajectories allow statistical descriptions of motility and identification of sperm heterogeneity. The substantial information provided by CASA enables the application of artificial intelligence (AI) techniques to interpret their biological significance. However, the type and format of CASA data, whether raw or condensed, pose challenges for analysis using conventional statistical methods. Advances in machine learning and deep learning have addressed these limitations by leveraging motility parameters and trajectory representations for automated classification and clustering of motility patterns. These methods, including supervised and unsupervised learning, have been employed to identify kinematic subpopulations within sperm samples, offering deeper insights into sperm dynamics. Open-source tools and CASA systems have facilitated this progress by providing accessible platforms for AI applications in sperm motility analysis. Although the use of machine learning in this field remains limited, integrating CASA-derived data with AI techniques shows potential for automating sperm classification and identifying motility patterns, advancing reproductive biology and fertility assessments. This work reviews the traditional use of CASA data, the analytical constraints, and the promising role of machine learning in enhancing the understanding of the heterogeneity of sperm kinematics.

Indexed as

Machine LearningSemen AnalysisSpermatozoaSperm MotilityBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansMaleartificial intelligenceCASAkinematic subpopulationsmotility parameterssperm heterogeneitysperm trajectories

Identifiers

PMID40791002
PMCPMC13065317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.