Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40790996›Full record

SynthesisClinical rehabilitation2025

Effectiveness of interventions in increasing physical activity of inpatients after stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Peter Hartley, Katie Bond, Rachel Dance, Isla Kuhn, Joanne McPeake, Faye Forsyth

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Peter HartleyDepartment of Physiotherapy, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1033-5897
Katie BondDepartment of Physiotherapy, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Rachel DanceIntegrated Therapies Department, James Paget University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Great Yarmouth, UK.
Isla KuhnMedical Library, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2879-4020
Joanne McPeakeThe Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Faye ForsythDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2107-3690

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ObjectiveTo synthesise the evidence of the effectiveness of interventions to increase levels of physical activity or reduce levels of sedentary activity of inpatients after a new stroke.Data sourcesMedline, PsychINFO, AMED and CINAHL were search between inception and June 2025 for randomised controlled studies of in-hospital interventions for adults after stroke which measured physical activity.Review methodsInterventions were grouped by common components. For each intervention group, the outcomes of physical activity (primary outcome), physical functional ability, and quality of life were analysed with meta-analysis. Adverse events were synthesised narratively.ResultsTen studies (696 participants) were included in the review. General activity feedback (SMD = 0.52, 95% CI: -0.07 to 1.10;

Indexed as

ExerciseExercise TherapyInpatientsStrokeStroke RehabilitationHumansQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as Topichospitalmeta-analysisphysical activityStrokesystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40790996
PMCPMC12414109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.