ArticleThe Journal of school health2025
Process Evaluation of a School-Based Intervention Promoting Sleep Health in Adolescents: A Mixed-Methods Study.
Article in The Journal of school health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Process Evaluation of a School-Based Intervention Promoting Sleep Health in Adolescents: A Mixed-Methods Study.The Journal of school health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPoor sleep health is increasingly recognized as a public health issue. Despite the potential of school-based interventions, few have successfully improved adolescent sleep health. To enhance intervention effectiveness, feasibility, and relevance, it is essential to understand barriers and facilitators affecting the adoption, implementation, and sustainment. This study evaluates these aspects for the sleep health promoting school-based intervention Charge Your Brainzzz in Dutch secondary schools.
methodsWe conducted 12 semistructured interviews with teachers from five implementation schools, complemented by 372 questionnaires completed by second- and third-grade students from various educational tracks. Qualitative data were thematically analyzed and quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and tests.
resultsAdoption was supported by teachers who valued sleep education and considered it a responsibility of schools. The intervention was generally well implemented, engaging, and aligned with teacher competencies and school structures. However, teachers questioned whether it would sufficiently improve adolescents' sleep health and questioned the intervention's optimal compatibility across educational tracks and grades. Adolescent satisfaction was moderate, showing differences among educational tracks. IMPLICATIONS FOR SCHOOL HEALTH POLICY, PRACTICE, AND EQUITY: Involving stakeholders through participatory co-creation is recommended to better address adolescents' diverse needs. Given the strong influence of the (social) environment on sleep, expanding Charge Your Brainzzz into a broader, systems-oriented approach could yield greater and more lasting impact.
conclusionsThis study provides insights into the adoption, implementation, and sustainment of Charge Your Brainzzz. While well received, further co-creative tailoring and a broader systems approach are needed to improve its impact on sleep health.
trial registrationISRCTN36701918.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.