Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40790951›Full record

ArticleClinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis

The Use of the Maximum Amplitude Parameter in Thromboelastography for Obstetric Anesthesiology: A Retrospective Study Conducted at a University Medical Center.

Daniel Shatalin, Kateryna Levenfus, Adina Weiss, Sorina Grisaru-Granovsky, Yaacov Gozal, Alexander Ronenson, Alexander Ioscovich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Daniel ShatalinDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Pain Treatment, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, affiliated with Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-0256-629X
Kateryna LevenfusDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Pain Treatment, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, affiliated with Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.ORCID 0009-0004-5253-102X
Adina WeissDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Pain Treatment, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, affiliated with Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-1219-4215
Sorina Grisaru-GranovskyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-3651-5156
Yaacov GozalDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Pain Treatment, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, affiliated with Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-9451-818X
Alexander RonensonDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Pain Treatment, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, affiliated with Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-2468-297X
Alexander IoscovichDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Pain Treatment, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, affiliated with Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-6449-0254

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and AimsThromboelastography (TEG) is a non-invasive, readily available quantitative test used to assess the clotting ability of whole blood. In this study, we aim to explore the indications for utilizing TEG during the peripartum period.MethodsA single-center, retrospective study was conducted, analyzing the electronic medical records of 288 women admitted to the labor and delivery unit, all of whom underwent TEG testing. The study period was five years. Data collected encompassed various hematological parameters; and TEG parameters with a focus on maximum amplitude (MA) were recorded. Furthermore, the diagnoses prompting TEG referral were documented for each participant.ResultsAll participants were categorized into one of the following six groups: gestational thrombocytopenia (n = 41, 14.24%), immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) (n = 33, 11.46%), preeclampsia (n = 27, 9.38%), preexisting coagulopathy (n = 14, 4.86%), suspected coagulopathy (n = 26, 9.03%), and massive bleeding (n = 147, 51.04%). TEG results indicated that MA values were within the normal range for the majority of participants in each category. Regional anesthesia was performed across all groups, with the following distribution: gestational thrombocytopenia (73.17%), ITP (36.36%), preeclampsia (62.96%), preexisting coagulopathy (64.29%), suspected coagulopathy (53.85%), and massive bleeding (65.46%).ConclusionsWe identified two primary reasons for performing TEG during the peripartum period: low platelet count and massive bleeding. TEG, particularly the MA parameter, plays a valuable role in peripartum management, particularly in guiding decisions regarding the suitability of neuraxial anesthesia in the presence of a low platelet count and in directing the administration of blood products in cases of massive bleeding.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, ObstetricalAnesthesiologyThrombelastographyAcademic Medical CentersAdultFemaleHumansPregnancyRetrospective Studiescoagulopathyneuraxial anesthesiaobstetric anesthesiaperipartumthromboelastography

Identifiers

PMID40790951
PMCPMC12344320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.