Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40790920›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2025

'I Wish It Were More Often Told to People Before They Are Prescribed These Medications How Hard It Is to Get Off Them': A Qualitative Descriptive Analysis of Free-Text Responses to a Survey on Reducing and Stopping Psychiatric Medication.

Miriam Boland, Agnes Higgins, Sookyung Kwak, Cathal Cadogan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Miriam BolandSchool of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-0865-2794
Agnes HigginsSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-0631-1884
Sookyung KwakSchool of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Cathal CadoganSchool of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

Miriam Boland was supported by a 1252 Scholarship from the School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Trinity College Dublin. The PSP workshop was funded by a grant received by the Health Research Board Ireland (CES-2023-008). The funding sources had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, writing of the report or decision to submit for publication.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDespite significant increases in the prescribing of psychiatric medication in recent years, many uncertainties exist regarding the process of reducing and stopping these medications. A James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership (PSP) study was conducted to identify the top 10 research priorities on reducing and stopping psychiatric medication. As part of the PSP study, an online survey was conducted, which asked respondents to submit their views and experiences of reducing and/or stopping psychiatric medication as free-text comments. This study aimed to conduct a descriptive analysis on these free-text survey responses.

methodsA qualitative descriptive analysis was undertaken on responses submitted to the online survey, which was disseminated using social media, newsletters and emails. Responses were submitted by three stakeholder groups (i.e., people with lived experience of taking and/or stopping psychiatric medication, family members/carers/supporters and healthcare professionals). All survey responses were downloaded, screened and analysed using template analysis. A coding template was iteratively developed using samples of responses and then applied to the responses by the researchers working independently.

resultsIn total, 705 responses contained free-text additional comments, of which 483 responses were considered in-scope. Six main themes were identified: (1) experiences of psychiatric medication, (2) challenges to reducing/stopping psychiatric medication, (3) strategies used to reduce/stop psychiatric medication, (4) outcomes of reducing/stopping psychiatric medication, (5) emotional context and (6) areas for improvement.

conclusionThis study identified numerous challenges faced by respondents when discontinuing psychiatric medication, the uncertainty that prevails in terms of the best tapering strategy and the emotional impact of taking and/or stopping psychiatric medication. The findings also highlight the importance of support during the discontinuation process, in particular psychosocial supports, and areas that could be targeted to improve the withdrawal process. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: An international Steering Group was established to oversee and guide the PSP study in accordance with the James Lind Alliance guidance and Patient and Public Involvement principles. Patient and public groups were represented on the Steering Group and were among the three key stakeholder groups (i.e., people with lived experience of taking and/or stopping psychiatric medication, family members/carers/supporters and healthcare professionals) engaged with throughout.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersPsychotropic DrugsAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSurveys and QuestionnairesPsychotropic Drugsantidepressantsantipsychoticsbenzodiazepinesdiscontinuationpsychiatricqualitative descriptive analysistaperingwithdrawal

Identifiers

PMID40790920
PMCPMC12339912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.