Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40790916›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2025

New energy layer reduction method for rapid intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) using a ridge filter.

Aoxiang Wang, Ya-Nan Zhu, Jufri Setianegara, Yuting Lin, Valentin Hamaide, Arnaud Pin, Peng Xiao, Qingguo Xie, Hao Gao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Aoxiang WangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Ya-Nan ZhuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, USA.
Jufri SetianegaraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, USA.
Yuting LinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, USA.
Valentin HamaideIon Beam Applications (IBA), Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Arnaud PinIon Beam Applications (IBA), Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Peng XiaoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Qingguo XieDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Hao GaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, USA.

Funding

Novel Optimization Methods and Treatment Planning System for Clinically-Deliverable Truly-Hybrid Proton-Photon RadiotherapyR37CA250921 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI Hao Gao · 2021 to 2026
$2.2M
Simultaneous dose and dose rate optimization for clinical FLASH proton radiotherapyR01CA261964 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI GAO, HAO · 2022 to 2025
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA261964NCI NIH HHS R37 CA250921NIH HHS R01CA261964NIH HHS R37CA250921
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEfficient delivery of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plays a pivotal role in improving the effectiveness of proton therapy. Accelerating delivery not only increases patient throughput but also improves the ability to manage dynamic target motion and reduces uncertainties, thereby enhancing treatment accuracy. Additionally, rapid delivery enables the effective use of breath-hold techniques, allowing for smaller target margins and providing better protection for healthy tissues. Since energy layer switching time constitute the majority of delivery time, reducing the number of energy layers can be highly beneficial for improving delivery efficiency. PURPOSE: This work proposes a novel energy layer reduction method for rapid IMPT using a ridge filter.

methodsThe width of the Bragg peak (BP) is extended using a ridge filter, referred to as the extended Bragg peak (EBP). The machine file of the generated EBP is subsequently incorporated in our in-house treatment planning system for inverse planning. The extended peak width reduces the number of energy layers required for target coverage. However, relying solely on EBP can compromise the accuracy of energy modulation. To address this limitation, pristine BP is utilized to fill small gaps left by EBP and ensure rapid dose fall-off at the distal and proximal edges of the target. To optimize the selection of BP and EBP energies, the problem is formulated as a mathematical model incorporating a group sparsity constraint. The model is then solved by a variant of block orthogonal matching pursuit algorithm, which selects BP and EBP energies in a greedy manner.

resultsThe combined use of BP and EBP, referred to as the BP-EBP, considerably reduced the number of energy layers required compared to conventional IMPT. For example, in an abdomen case, the BP-EBP method decreased the energy layers from 79 to 28 (11 for BP and 17 for EBP) while maintaining comparable plan quality. Similarly, in a lung case, it reduced the energy layers from 70 to 30 (9 for BP and 21 for EBP), achieving slightly better plan quality than the conventional approach. Moreover, the BP-EBP reduced delivery time by more than 50% in both cases compared to conventional IMPT. Furthermore, the feasibility of BP-EBP was experimentally demonstrated on the ProteusONE proton therapy system.

conclusionsA novel energy reduction method is proposed and experimentally demonstrated that leverages BP and EBP generated by a ridge filter that significantly decreases the number of energy levels required in IMPT, thereby enhancing delivery efficiency.

Indexed as

Proton TherapyRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedHumansRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedTime Factorsextended Bragg peakIMPTridge filter

Identifiers

PMID40790916
PMCPMC13616492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.