ReviewBiological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society2025
Non-breeding social behaviour as an investment in reducing future territoriality costs.
Review in Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Social and spatial drivers of the multitiered structure of zebra finch social networks.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
- City lizards are more social.Biology letters · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Territoriality is costly, and animals should adopt strategies to cope with these costs. Seasonal territoriality for breeding - a common strategy in many groups of animals - can reduce costs during the non-breeding season but requires establishing new territories every breeding season. Many seasonal breeders also become more tolerant of conspecifics during the non-breeding season and form social groups containing many individuals. Recent evidence has suggested that these social associations are not random and can entail carry-over effects extending into the following breeding season. Here, we propose that one strategy that seasonal, territorial breeders may employ is to use non-breeding social behaviour to reduce future breeding territoriality costs, through a dear-enemy-like effect. Specifically, by being social during the non-breeding season with previous territorial neighbours, individuals can increase both their and their neighbour's survival, and jointly defend and exploit common territorial areas, ultimately reducing neighbourhood turnover. Reduced neighbourhood turnover can then facilitate re-forming prior territorial boundaries, thereby offsetting the costs of territory establishment and facilitating earlier breeding (which can significantly increase reproductive output). We review evidence supporting our hypothesis and provide predictions and future research directions to bridge current gaps in understanding the link between non-breeding social behaviours and breeding territoriality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.