Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40790901›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of methods in psychiatric research2025

Item Analysis of the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adults Version Using the Rasch Model in Two Forms for People With Schizophrenia in Taiwan.

En-Chi Chiu, Ya-Chen Lee, Yi-Ching Wu, Shu-Chun Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of methods in psychiatric research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

En-Chi ChiuDepartment of Long-Term Care, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-6052-0871
Ya-Chen LeeDepartment of Occupational Therapy, College of Medical and Health Science, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Yi-Ching WuDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Taipei City Psychiatric Center, Taipei City Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Shu-Chun LeeDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Taipei City Psychiatric Center, Taipei City Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-8007-0409

Funding

Department of Health, Taipei City Government 11301-62-022Taipei City Hospital TPCH-114-63
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adults version (BRIEF-A) consists of two forms, self-report and informant-report. Each form encompasses nine scales to assess executive functions. The study aimed to examine the unidimensionality of each scale and item-level agreement between the two forms in people with schizophrenia.

methodsA total of 197 people with schizophrenia and 194 caregivers were recruited from a single psychiatric center. Among the people with schizophrenia, 44.2% were male, with a mean age of 44.0 years. As for the caregivers who completed the informant-report form, 27.8% were male, with a mean age of 60.4 years. The unidimensionality of each BRIEF-A scale was assessed using Rasch analysis. Weighted kappa and percentage of agreement were used to examine the item-level agreement between the two forms.

resultsThe infit and outfit mean squares of all items on each scale of the self-report form were 0.65-1.48. Except for the Plan/Organize scale, the items of the other eight scales in the informant-report form met the standards for infit and outfit mean squares (0.69-1.44). Principal component analysis of the standardized residuals of the nine scales were 1.4-1.8 and 1.5-2.1 for the self-report and informant-report forms, respectively. Weighted kappa and percentage of agreement between the two forms were 0.02-0.33 and 36.8%-63.4% respectively.

conclusionThe BRIEF-A has acceptable unidimensionality for people with schizophrenia. The slight to fair item-level agreement between the two forms necessitates cautious explanation of results and incorporation of multiple informants' perspectives to ensure a more thorough and accurate assessment of executive functions.

Indexed as

Behavior Rating ScaleExecutive FunctionNeuropsychological TestsPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesPsychometricsSchizophreniaSchizophrenic PsychologyAdultAgedCaregiversFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSelf ReportTaiwancaregiverexecutive functionsRasch analysisschizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID40790901
PMCPMC12339908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.