ArticleBJPsych open2025
Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety: exploring validity with robust measures of classical theory parameters and a rating scale model in university students.
Article in BJPsych open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial Intelligence for Predicting Treatment Response in Patients With Anxiety Disorders After Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- The Overlooked Driver of Hypertension: Mental Stress at the Crossroad of Cardiology and Psychiatry.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNo research has assessed Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HRSA) psychometric properties in Ethiopian university students, using item response theory (IRT) and classical theory.
aimsThis study aimed to assess psychometric properties of the English HRSA in Ethiopian students, using IRT and classical theory.
methodUniversity students (
resultsConfirmatory factor analysis (CFA) favoured a one-factor structure because fit indices for the one-factor model; and two distinct two-factor models were similar, but high interfactor correlations violated discriminant validity criteria in two-factor models. This one-factor structure showed structural invariance as evidenced by multi-group CFA across gender groups. No ceiling/floor effects were seen for the HRSA total scores. Infit and outfit mean square values for all the items were within the acceptable range (0.6-1.4). Four threshold estimates (
conclusionsThe findings favour the validity of a one-factor structure of the HRSA with adequate item properties (classical and rating scale model), convergent validity, reliability and measurement invariance (structural and item level) across gender groups in Ethiopian university students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.