Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40790838›Full record

ReviewJournal of biosciences2025

Thirty years of the Baranyi and Roberts model: Predictions, precautions, risk assessment, and beyond.

Dhruba Dey, Debapriya Mukherjee, Pallab Ghosh, Dipshikha Chakravortty

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of biosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dhruba DeyDepartment of Undergraduate Programme, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, India.
Debapriya Mukherjee
Pallab Ghosh
Dipshikha Chakravortty

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In today's world, food safety is of paramount importance. Even a slight lapse can lead to significant economic losses and place a heavy burden on the healthcare system. Over the years, multiple mathematical models have been developed to predict microbial growth in commercial foods. However, each of these models had to give up at least one of the factors, i.e., generality, realism, or precision. The Baranyi and Roberts model was proposed in the 1990s and was an extension of the logistic model. It took 'realism' into account and bridged the gap between the conditions affecting populations in nature and how they are represented on paper. The realistic attributes of the model allowed it to model, for the first time, the lag time. In this review, we have discussed the model in detail, along with its extrapolations that made it flexible. We have further discussed how the Baranyi model is still important in food safety regimes. We have also discussed how one can explain the setting up of the adjustment factor used in this model. Our literature review has revealed how the Baranyi and Roberts model continues to be relevant even after 30 years of its proposition, and further insights on the biochemical aspects of the model's assumptions might help in strengthening its predictions.

Indexed as

Food MicrobiologyFood SafetyModels, BiologicalModels, TheoreticalHumansRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID40790838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.