Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40790776›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2025

Religious belief, subjective social status and residents' happiness: empirical evidence from Chinese general social survey from 2010 to 2021.

Jindian Liu, Chunyan Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jindian LiuCollege of Economics & Management, Northwest A&F University, Xianyang, China.
Chunyan WuInstitute of Higher Education, Northwest A&F University, Xianyang, China. trunyenwu@126.com.

Funding

Humanities and Social Science Fund of Ministry of Education of China 23XJC790004Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province 2023-JC-QN-0779Shaanxi Provincial Social Science Fund 2023D056
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper empirically investigates the impact of religious beliefs on residents’ happiness based on CGSS data from 2010 to 2021. The specific impact of religious beliefs on residents’ happiness is estimated by gender, urban-rural status, health status, and regional distribution. Endogeneity is addressed through the use of instrumental variable and propensity score matching methods. A mediation effect model is employed to test the significance of the intermediate path played by residents’ self-evaluation of social status and depression frequency between religious beliefs and happiness. The conclusions are as follows: (1) Religious belief has a significant promoting effect on happiness, and this promoting effect satisfies causal inference. (2) Religious belief has a specific impact on the happiness of different groups. The positive promoting effect of religious belief on the happiness of groups in the western region, men, urban areas, and those in poor health is stronger. (3) The mechanism analysis shows that religious belief indirectly acts on the improvement of residents’ happiness by enhancing their self-assessed social status and providing emotional support. The depression frequency does not play the intermediate mechanism role of religious belief affecting happiness, but residents with a higher depression frequency can obtain a greater increase in happiness through religious belief.

Indexed as

HappinessReligion and PsychologySocial StatusAdultChinaDepressionEast Asian PeopleFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReligionSurveys and QuestionnairesEmpirical analysisHappinessMechanism analysisReligious beliefSelf-rated of social status

Identifiers

PMID40790776
PMCPMC12341311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.