ReviewBiomedical engineering online2025
A review of machine learning applications in heart health.
Review in Biomedical engineering online, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The application of machine learning in healthcare continues to gain attention as researchers attempt to prove its potential for the enhancement of diagnosis and prognosis accuracy. Although many applications of machine learning have been well studied, there remain substantial opportunities for advancement. The field of healthcare holds particularly strong potential for improvement from integration with machine learning. In the future, clinicians will likely utilize machine learning to enhance the efficiency of diagnosis and prognosis, optimizing the delivery of care. This study conducts a comprehensive examination of feature selection methodologies, model architectures, and fine-tuning techniques related to diverse diagnostic and prognostic scenarios within the domain of heart health. It addresses some key gaps in earlier research, including the lack of agreement on which data sources are most effective for classifying stroke and heart attack. This review contributes an analysis of current machine learning methods in stroke and heart attack research, highlighting key gaps such as limited use of multimodal data, external validation, and class imbalance mitigation. It suggests improvements, including the adoption of advanced sampling techniques and the use of comprehensive performance metrics. The findings suggest that despite extensive research on machine learning in cardiovascular health, there are gaps to be addressed in methodologies for data collection, preprocessing, model development, evaluation, and feature engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.