Trial reportEuropean journal of medical research2025
Ultrasound monitoring respiratory muscle rehabilitation training can promote the recovery of diaphragmatic function in traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) patients.
Trial report in European journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The clinical significance of miR-18a-3p in traumatic spinal cord injury and its functional role in mediating apoptosis, inflammation and oxidative stress.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveTraumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) often leads to respiratory dysfunction, in which the impaired diaphragm function is one of the main causes. Respiratory muscle rehabilitation training can be used to improve respiratory function, but its effect on diaphragm function has not been deeply investigated. This study employed ultrasound monitoring to assess how respiratory muscle rehabilitation training affects diaphragmatic function in TSCI patients.
methodsIn this prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) study, 56 patients with spinal cord injury were randomly divided into experimental group and control group, 28 cases in each group. The experimental group received respiratory muscle rehabilitation training twice a day for 15 min each time; and the control group received only the usual care. The diaphragm thickness, diaphragm movement and diaphragm contraction speed of the two groups were measured by ultrasound before and after training.
resultsCompared to the control group, the experimental group had significant improvements. Diaphragm thickness increased from 2.05 ± 0.25 mm to 2.38 ± 0.30 mm in the experimental group (P < 0.001), while the control group changed minimally from 2.02 ± 0.22 mm to 2.05 ± 0.23 mm (P = 0.338). Diaphragm movement increased from 1.52 ± 0.20 mm to 1.85 ± 0.25 mm in the experimental group (P < 0.001), versus a small change from 1.50 ± 0.18 mm to 1.53 ± 0.20 mm in the control group (P = 0.315). Diaphragm contraction speed accelerated from 1.20 ± 0.15 cm/s to 1.45 ± 0.20 cm/s in the experimental group (P < 0.001), while the control group changed slightly from 1.18 ± 0.13 cm/s to 1.20 ± 0.15 cm/s (P = 0.380). Respiratory frequency decreased from 20.3 ± 3.4 times/min to 16.0 ± 2.5 times/min in the experimental group (P < 0.001), and the control group changed less from 19.5 ± 2.1 times/min to 18.2 ± 2.3 times/min (P = 0.070). Ventilator removal time was significantly reduced in the experimental group (14.1 ± 1.5 days) compared to the control group (20.2 ± 2.0 days, P = 0.002).
conclusionRespiratory muscle rehabilitation significantly enhances diaphragm function and respiratory parameters in spinal cord injury patients. Ultrasound monitoring effectively evaluates these improvements, providing a valuable, novel clinical approach for TSCI rehabilitation. While this preliminary RCT demonstrates positive outcomes, the sample size limitation (n = 56) and absence of long-term follow-up should be acknowledged. These aspects will be addressed through larger sample sizes and extended observation periods in subsequent research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.