Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40790478›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2025

Discrepancies between supervisor self-evaluations and staff perceptions of leadership: a cross-sectional study in healthcare.

Nguyen Hoang Long, Julie Sochalski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nguyen Hoang LongCollege of Health Sciences, VinUniversity, Ha Noi, Gia Lam District, Vietnam. long.nh@vinuni.edu.vn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4955-1191
Julie SochalskiUniversity of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, 418 Curie Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmployees' perceptions of their supervisors' leadership influence their conduct and daily performance. These perceptions often conflict with leaders' self-assessments. Understanding this incongruency can help leaders improve their leadership skills. This study aimed to assess the congruency between frontline healthcare staff's and supervisors' perceptions of leadership styles.

methodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted between January 2021 and June 2022. Data were collected from a convenience sample of 574 professional and technical staff (nurses, midwives, and technicians) and 93 direct supervisors recruited from all seven hospitals of the Vinmec Healthcare System, which is the largest private healthcare system in Vietnam. Leadership style was assessed using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ 5X).

resultsStudy findings revealed similarities and differences in perceptions of leadership between staff and supervisors. Both groups agreed that transactional contingent reward behaviors were most frequently used, as indicated by mean scores above 2.5, whereas laissez-faire behaviors were least often utilized, with the lowest overall ratings (supervisors: 0.92 ± 0.67; staff: 1.23 ± 0.78). However, supervisors' scores were significantly higher than those of their staff for almost all leadership components, with large and significant mean differences observed in areas such as individualized consideration (mean difference = 0.63, t = 9.34, p <.001). Notably, staff rated supervisors as using laissez-faire behaviors more frequently than their supervisors assumed they did, with a statistically significant difference (t = - 3.96, p <.001). Regarding leadership outcomes, supervisors believed that their leadership style was more effective than their staff perceived it, as evidenced by higher scores for effectiveness (2.94 vs. 2.72, t = 3.46, p <.001), satisfaction (3.02 vs. 2.73, t = 3.90, p <.001), and extra effort (2.98 vs. 2.57, t = 6.49, p <.001).

conclusionSupervisors should recognize their leadership styles and how they are perceived by staff, using feedback as a basis for self-improvement and ensuring their intentions are clearly communicated. In nursing, 360-degree feedback and reflective practices may help narrow leadership perception gaps. Future research should examine factors underlying these discrepancies and assess whether improving alignment enhances team performance and care quality. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Healthcare leadershipLeadership evaluationsLeadership styles

Identifiers

PMID40790478
PMCPMC12337420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.