ArticleBMC microbiology2025
High-throughput sequencing to analyze changes in the human scalp microbiome during the use of a shampoo.
Article in BMC microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Shampoo, a crucial personal hygiene product, holds significant economic importance. Given the complex interactions of the scalp microbiome and its impact on scalp and hair health, understanding how shampoo affects this ecosystem is vital. Results showed that 28-day shampoo use significantly increased scalp moisture content (P = 0.04) without affecting sebum secretion P = 0.23. Regarding the bacterial community, while alpha diversity indices showed no significant changes, the relative abundance of Proteobacteria was decreased significantly, and the relative abundance of Actinobacteriota was increased significantly; the relative abundance of Cutibacterium genus was increased significantly, from 11.58 to 28.66%, more abundant than Staphylococcus genus (from 16.55 to 18.37%). For the fungal community, the Chao 1 index decreased significantly, and the relative abundances of several phyla and genera changed, but retained the core microbiome (Malassezia). Canonical correspondence analysis revealed that the microbial communities shifted from an oily environment to a more moisturized environment. Network analysis showed different co-occurrence relationships between core taxa and physicochemical factors for bacteria and fungi. Functional prediction via PICRUSt2 and FUNGuild indicated that the shampoo altered metabolic pathways of bacteria and the trophic modes of fungi. In conclusion, the study described the complex community dynamics of scalp microorganisms before and after 28-day shampoo use. The results will help improve the interactions among shampoo, scalp microbiota, and scalp physiology, offering valuable insights for the development of scalp and hair care products and strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.