ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2026
Evaluation of a Technique to Minimize Complications in Breast Augmentation Surgery with Anatomical Implants: A Single Surgeon's, 10-Year Experience.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBreast augmentation surgery (BAS) is one of the commonest plastic surgery procedures worldwide. A long-standing debate on the use of anatomical implants versus round implants in terms of complications, especially implant rotation, monopolizes relevant bibliography in recent years.
methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted. All patients' records undergoing primary breast augmentation with anatomical implants from January 2010 to December 2023 by a single surgeon (V.K.), who implemented a novel surgical technique, were assessed for eligibility. Patients' demographics, and preoperative and operative data were recorded. Statistical analysis was conducted using IBM® SPSS® Statistics version 25.0.
resultsIn total, 622 patients underwent breast augmentation surgery with anatomical implants during the study period (median age 34 years, median body mass index 22.3, median follow-up time 43.8 months). Ten implants were rotated (0.8%) and correlated in univariate analysis with implant projection type (p = 0.003). Twelve implants (0.96%) were complicated by capsular contracture, six (0.48%) by bottoming-out deformity, two patients (0.32%) developed a unilateral hematoma in the first 24 h and one patient (0.16%) developed a double-bubble deformity.
conclusionThe use of the proposed surgical technique minimizes complication rates, making anatomical implants an optimal choice for breast augmentation surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
40790387What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.