Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40790335›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Towards a quality control framework for cerebral cortical organoids.

Héloïse Castiglione, Lucie Madrange, Camille Baquerre, Benoît Guy Christian Maisonneuve, Thomas Lemonnier, Jean-Philippe Deslys, Frank Yates, Thibault Honegger, Jessica Rontard, Pierre-Antoine Vigneron

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Héloïse CastiglioneSupBiotech, Ecole d'Ingénieurs en Biotechnologies, Villejuif, France. heloise.castiglione@netri.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7543-0836
Lucie MadrangeSupBiotech, Ecole d'Ingénieurs en Biotechnologies, Villejuif, France.
Camille BaquerreNETRI, Lyon, France.
Benoît Guy Christian MaisonneuveNETRI, Lyon, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6961-3671
Thomas LemonnierSupBiotech, Ecole d'Ingénieurs en Biotechnologies, Villejuif, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1006-5564
Jean-Philippe DeslysCommissariat à l'Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives (CEA), Service d'Etude des Prions et des Infections Atypiques (SEPIA), Université Paris-Saclay, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France.
Frank YatesSupBiotech, Ecole d'Ingénieurs en Biotechnologies, Villejuif, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3590-5745
Thibault HoneggerNETRI, Lyon, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1716-7363
Jessica Rontard *NETRI, Lyon, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-9422-2339
Pierre-Antoine Vigneron *SupBiotech, Ecole d'Ingénieurs en Biotechnologies, Villejuif, France. pierre-antoine.vigneron@supbiotech.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2918-0909

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-19-CE14-0042
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cerebral organoids offer significant potential for neuroscience research as complex in vitro models that mimic human brain development. However, challenges related to their quality and reproducibility hinder their reliability. Discrepancies in morphology, size, cellular composition, and cytoarchitectural organization limit their applications, particularly in disease modeling, drug screening, and neurotoxicity testing. Critically, current methods for organoid characterization often lack standardization, restricting their broader applicability. To address the need for standardized quality assessment of cerebral organoids, we developed a Quality Control (QC) methodology for 60-day cortical organoids, evaluating five key criteria using a scoring system: morphology, size and growth profile, cellular composition, cytoarchitectural organization, and cytotoxicity. We implemented a hierarchical approach, beginning with non-invasive assessments to exclude low-quality organoids, while reserving in-depth analyses for those that passed the initial evaluation. To validate this framework, we exposed 60-day cortical organoids to graded doses of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), inducing a range of quality outcomes. The QC system demonstrated its robustness by accurately discriminating organoid qualities. Our proposed QC framework is designed to be user-friendly, flexible, and broadly applicable, making it suitable for routine assessment of cerebral organoid quality. Additionally, its scalability enables industrial applications, offering a valuable tool for advancing both fundamental and pre-clinical research.

Indexed as

Cerebral CortexOrganoidsAnimalsHumansHydrogen PeroxideQuality ControlReproducibility of ResultsHydrogen PeroxideCerebral organoidsHierarchical scoring methodologyQuality controlReproducibilityStandardization.

Identifiers

PMID40790335
PMCPMC12340003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.