ArticleScientific reports2025
In Silico discovery of novel androgen receptor inhibitors for prostate cancer therapy using virtual screening, molecular docking, and molecular dynamics simulations.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Discovery of a novel and potent KRASJournal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry · 2026Article
- Graphene Oxide-Hydroxyapatite Nanocomposite Coatings and Extracellular Matrix Protein Interactions for Enhanced Osseointegration in Dental Implants.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2026Article
- Inflammasome-associated pyroptosis and tumor angiogenesis in prostate cancer.Iranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2026Review
- Demonstrating the Absence of Correlation Between Molecular Docking and in vitro Cytotoxicity in Anti-Breast Cancer Research: Root Causes and Practical Resolutions.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2025Review
- Molecular docking and dynamics in protein serine/threonine kinase drug discovery: advances, challenges, and future perspectives.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study employs an integrated computational approach to identify novel androgen receptor (AR) inhibitors, a key target in prostate cancer (PC) therapy. The full-length AR structure was modeled using MODELLER v10 (template: 1GS4) and validated via Ramachandran analysis, DOPE scoring, and normal mode analysis. A ligand-based pharmacophore derived from 20 known AR inhibitors guided high-throughput virtual screening and molecular docking with AutoDock Vina. ADMET profiling assessed pharmacokinetics, while in silico target prediction, STRING-based PPI network analysis, and Gene Ontology enrichment elucidated the functional role of AR. The stability of the AR-ligand complex was evaluated through a 100-ns molecular dynamics simulation using GROMACS, with RMSD analysis. MODELLER achieved 92.5% sequence identity, 99% query coverage, and a 2.30 Å resolution, yielding the optimal model (DOPE score: - 29,412.36), validated by Ramachandran analysis (98.33% favored residues) and normal mode analysis (eigenvalue: 5.28563e-04). The pharmacophore model (AUC: 0.92, EF: 8.5, MCC: 0.78) facilitated virtual screening and docking, identifying Estrone (ZINC000013509425) as the lead inhibitor (docking score: - 10.9 kcal/mol). Key interactions included hydrogen bonding with Asn705(A) and hydrophobic contacts with Trp741(A), Leu704(A), Met742(A), and Met780(A). ADMET analysis confirmed favorable pharmacokinetics, while network analysis reinforced AR's role in oncogenic pathways. Molecular dynamics simulations indicated complex stability, with protein RMSD stabilizing at 1.5-2.0 Å and ligand RMSD at 3.5-4.0 Å. Estrone was identified as a potent AR inhibitor with strong binding, stable dynamics, and favorable pharmacokinetics for PC therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.