ArticleBehavior research methods2025
Cognitive modeling of lure discriminability in the Mnemonic Similarity Task.
Article in Behavior research methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lure discrimination in the Mnemonic Similarity Task (MST) has been widely used to measure pattern separation. However, the classic index of lure discrimination in the MST has arbitrary assumptions with limited supporting evidence. The present study has thus developed several models with different assumptions on the process underlying MST as well as the different model-derived indices of lure discrimination. Furthermore, we have assessed and compared these models in a measurement-based approach. We found that the model for the classic lure discrimination index fails to accurately predict the responses in an MST from > 150 participants. Instead, a new index based on the unidimensional signal detection model provides the best fits of the empirical dataset. This work highlights the value of model-based approaches in measuring lure discriminability in the MST.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40790284What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.