ArticleScientific reports2025
Optimizing water-efficient agriculture: evaluating the sustainability of soil management and irrigation synergies using fuzzy extent analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sustainable agriculture demands the integration of optimized irrigation and soil tillage practices. Poor selection or mismatched combinations of these practices can lead to inefficient resource use, declining soil health, and reduced crop productivity. Despite extensive research on individual tillage and irrigation methods, limited studies explored their combined effects on multiple agricultural sustainability parameters. This gap underscores the need for a comprehensive assessment framework that can guide farmers and stakeholders in identifying optimal combinations for diverse agricultural objectives. This study employs a compounded fuzzy extent analysis to evaluate the cumulative impact of various soil tillage and irrigation methods on key agricultural parameters, including affordability, maximum yield, climate resilience, water usage, soil disruption, disease resistance, ease of operation, nutrient utilization, and crop diversification. The analysis compares individual practices and their combinations using comparative matrices to identify the most suitable options across all parameters. The fuzzy logic approach addresses data uncertainty by converting linguistic variables into triangular fuzzy numbers, enabling more accurate decision-making. The results indicate that Zero Tillage is the most effective tillage practice (score of 0.176), while Deficit Irrigation emerges as the most efficient irrigation method, scoring 0.144. The research suggests that integrating Zero-Tillage (ZT) with Deficit Irrigation (DI) is the most cost-effective agricultural practice. Additionally, combining No-Tillage (NT) with Surface Irrigation and Mulching (SIM) results in higher yields and improved water use efficiency. Furthermore, the synergy of No-Tillage (NT) and Drip Irrigation (DI) enhances crop resilience to climate change. These findings provide valuable insights for developing sustainable agricultural strategies that balance productivity, resource conservation, and environmental protection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.