Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40790226›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2025

Faculty development for junior educators: advancing the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) Through Co-Teaching and Mentoring.

Fatemeh Keshmiri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Fatemeh KeshmiriMedical Education Department, Education Development Center, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran. Drkeshmiri1400@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6791-2579

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe study aimed to evaluate the effect of a faculty development program (FDP) on learner-related outcomes. This longitudinal program was designed by integrating co-teaching and mentoring methods. The FDP specifically focused on enhancing the competencies of junior educators in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL). Within the program, a mentor collaborated with a junior educator to generate ideas, design studies, plan and implement educational strategies, and evaluate outcomes-all aimed at addressing educational challenges or applying innovative methods in the educational setting. Learner-related outcomes were assessed using the three levels (reaction, learning, and behavior) of the Kirkpatrick model.

resultsThe educators' perception toward SoTL activity and satisfaction were 35.60 ± 4.30 and 4.4 ± 0.7, respectively. The success rate of educators in conducting SoTL projects was 90.4%. The score of SoTL reports in the learning level was 85 ± 8. The productions of SoTL activities, including 38 grant funds, five SoTL festival awards, and nine projects, were published in journals and 10 abstracts. The experiences of the junior educators about the FDP are categorized into a theme of 'team learning in the teaching process'. The combination of co-teaching and mentoring elements created a supportive and collaborative environment in the FDP.

Indexed as

FacultyLearningMentoringStaff DevelopmentTeachingFemaleHumansMaleCo-teachingEducationEducational scholarshipEducatorFaculty development programMentorMentoringScholarScholarship of teaching and learningSoTLTeacher

Identifiers

PMID40790226
PMCPMC12341095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.