ArticleBMC health services research2025
From stress to support: an ethnographic journey of a staff-led wellbeing intervention in maternity services.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Making the invisible visible: a case study of the healing hearts initiative within the SEED wellbeing program in Australian healthcare.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAddressing occupational distress in maternal services is imperative to ensuring staff retention and patient safety. Interventions to promote wellbeing among healthcare staff are urgently needed. However, little is known about the implementation of such interventions in hospital maternity services. This study aimed to explore the workplace demands and stressors experienced by healthcare staff in hospital maternity services and identify how these demands and stressors affect engagement in workplace wellbeing activities.
methodsThis qualitative study employed an ethnographic approach in maternity services in regional Australia. Data were collected through observations over a 12-week period before and during the implementation of a wellbeing program called SEED. Participants included healthcare staff and leaders employed in maternity services. Key themes and insights from the observational data were identified through reflexive thematic analysis. The study followed COREQ guidelines to report key aspects of the research team, methods, context, findings, and analysis.
resultsSix themes were identified, depicting both the challenges and opportunities for implementing workplace wellbeing activities in maternity services. The first three themes highlighted pre-existing challenges that affected staff engagement in wellbeing activities: (1) Disconnection Across the Service; (2) Balancing Role Expectations and Wellbeing at Work; and (3) Leaders Trusting in Wellbeing but Staff not Trusting in Leaders. The subsequent three themes described opportunities for engagement: (4) Staff are the Experts of Their Own Wellbeing and Work Environment; (5) Fostering Connection through Conversations; and (6) Cultivating Camaraderie within the Service.
conclusionBy identifying challenges such as disconnection and lack of trust, alongside opportunities like collaboration and camaraderie, the findings provide actionable insights for designing effective wellbeing activities. Gaining leaders' trust and commitment, followed by engaging staff in collaborative decision-making, is crucial for successful implementation. This research contributes to the global clinical community by providing a nuanced understanding of workplace wellbeing implementation in maternity services, offering a blueprint for similar interventions in healthcare settings worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.