ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2025
Optimising the care of the trapped patient following a motor vehicle collision: A UK-Based Delphi consensus study.
Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMotor vehicle collisions (MVCs) are a leading cause of injury and death worldwide. Up to 40% of casualties may become trapped and entrapment is associated with delayed care and worse outcomes. There is little national or international consensus guiding the care of physically trapped patients who cannot self-extricate. This study aimed to develop multidisciplinary consensus-based principles to optimise clinical and operational care for trapped patients following MVC.
methodsA three-round Delphi study was conducted from January to March 2025, following the CREDES framework. A multi-professional steering group developed preliminary statements informed by literature review and expert consultation. Subject matter experts (SMEs) with operational experience in extrication, prehospital, and trauma care were recruited through stakeholder organisations. Statements were refined iteratively through SME feedback. Consensus was defined as ≥ 70% agreement or disagreement. Statements reaching consensus were removed from subsequent rounds; others were revised based on free-text feedback.
resultsSixty-six SMEs participated, with high engagement across all three rounds. Consensus was achieved for 104 statements covering standardised extrication terminology, prioritisation of time-sensitive extrication for critically injured patients, minimisation of unnecessary on-scene interventions, emphasis on early psychological support for trapped casualties, and the importance of interdisciplinary communication and coordination. The consensus supports a paradigm shift towards rapid, patient-centred extrication, balancing clinical needs, operational realities, and psychological welfare.
conclusionsThis Delphi study establishes expert-endorsed principles for the care of physically trapped patients following MVCs. Adoption of these principles could reduce delays, strengthen multi-agency response and improve patient outcomes. Further work is required to validate the impact of these recommendations on clinical outcomes and to support their integration into practice through policy development, training, and evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.