Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40790199›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2025

"I don't think there's necessarily a one size fits all" negotiating competing priorities in nurse shift scheduling: a qualitative study.

Hannah Ruth Barker, Peter Griffiths, Chiara Dall'Ora

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hannah Ruth BarkerUniversity of Southampton, Southampton, UK. h.r.barker@soton.ac.uk.
Peter GriffithsUniversity of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Chiara Dall'OraUniversity of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe nursing workforce globally faces significant challenges, including burnout, stress, and absenteeism, exacerbated by unsafe staffing levels and suboptimal working conditions. In England, many nursing staff express intentions to leave their roles, driven by work-life imbalance. This study explores how the preferences and constraints of nursing staff, nurse managers, and hospital directors interact to influence shift scheduling decisions within the NHS, aiming to identify strategies that reconcile individual wellbeing with organisational imperatives.

methodsThis qualitative study employed framework analysis, guided by the Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument (TKI) to understand conflict management approaches in shift scheduling. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 17 nursing staff, five nurse managers, and six hospital directors across five diverse NHS Trusts in England. Interviews were conducted remotely, transcribed verbatim, and analysed to identify key themes and patterns.

resultsThree primary themes were identified: Balancing Choice with Consistency, Predictability, and Flexibility; Adequate Rest and Recovery Between Shifts; and Enjoyment and Engagement at Work. The study found that collaborative and compromising conflict management approaches were most effective in preventing potential conflicts from escalating into actual conflicts. Flexible and predictable scheduling was crucial for enhancing nurse wellbeing and retention, while rigid policies often led to increased turnover and reduced morale. The study also highlighted the importance of considering external constraints, such as caring responsibilities, which can limit the effectiveness of workplace solutions.

conclusionsEffective nurse shift scheduling requires a blend of conflict management strategies, with an emphasis on collaborative and compromising approaches. By prioritising flexible scheduling and proactive communication, healthcare organisations can better support their nursing workforce, enhancing both individual wellbeing and organisational efficiency. These findings have significant implications for improving the sustainability and quality of healthcare service provision.

Indexed as

Flexible schedulingNursingPersonnel staffing and schedulingProfessional organizationsShift workStaffing and schedulingWorkforceWork-life balance

Identifiers

PMID40790199
PMCPMC12337461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.