ArticleBMC surgery2025
Optimal age selection for posterior hemivertebra resection and short fusion of a solitary simple lower thoracic or lumbar hemivertebra.
Article in BMC surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Growth-Based Decision-Making in Congenital Scoliosis with Multiple Vertebral Anomalies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hemivertebra (HV) is a leading cause of congenital scoliosis; however, the optimal timing for surgical intervention remains uncertain. This study aimed to compare surgical outcomes in children under 10 years old with scoliosis caused by a solitary simple lower thoracic or lumbar HV (T8-L5). From January 2015 to January 2024, we retrospectively analyzed 49 consecutive congenital scoliosis patients treated with posterior hemivertebra resection, fusion, and pedicle screw fixation. Of these, 35 patients met all inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. A minimum follow-up period of 12 months was maintained. We used ROC curve analysis to determine the age at which the rate of unplanned reoperation decreased, identifying a cutoff age of 5.07 years. Based on this criterion, we divided the pediatric population into two groups: the younger age group (≤ 5 years) and the older age group (> 5 years). No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of correction rates in the coronal and sagittal planes. However, the unplanned reoperation rate was significantly higher in the younger age group (P = 0.016). Our findings suggest that delaying surgery until between five and ten years of age, combined with close follow-up, results in satisfactory outcomes with a lower rate of unplanned reoperation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.