ArticleBMC cancer2025
Adverse drug events of immune checkpoint inhibitors - a retrospective, descriptive real-world data analysis.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Real-World Safety of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review of Comparative Cohort Studies.Current oncology reports · 2026Pooled it
- Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced bullous pemphigoid: a systematic review of clinical characteristics and outcomes based on case reports.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Leveraging a QSP Platform for Prediction of Clinical Efficacy and Safety Biomarkers in Immuno-Oncology Combination Therapy.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Association of sodium-glucose co-transport protein 2 inhibitor use with clinical outcomes in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors: a pan-tumor propensity-matched analysis.The oncologist · 2026Article
- Programmed Cell Death Protein 1-Interleukin-2 Bispecific Agents for Cancer Therapy.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2026Review
- Elevated C-Reactive Protein as a Potential Biomarker for Neurological Adverse Events in Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy: A Prospective Cohort Study.Oncology research · 2026Article
- Mechanistic drivers of PD-L1/CTLA-4 checkpoint inhibitor-associated immune toxicity and systemic organ injury.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Virus-driven remodeling of the immune microenvironment and response to immune checkpoint inhibitors: the infection- immunity-cancer crosstalk.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Hematologic immune-related adverse events in skin cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a case series.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsThe objective of this study was to analyze immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in a real-world data sample and examine the differences in incidence between affected organ systems, irAE severity, therapeutic agent, and gender.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed all consecutive patients treated with anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) antibodies, anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors, and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors between January 2020 and May 2023 in a tertiary referral center in Switzerland. IrAEs documented in the electronic health records (EHR) were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) and analyzed descriptively.
resultsAmong the 500 patients, 196 (39.2%) were female. Treatments included pembrolizumab (51.2%), atezolizumab (20.2%), nivolumab (14.4%), durvalumab (6.4%), ipilimumab in combination with nivolumab (4.8%), cemiplimab (1.4%), avelumab (1.2%), and ipilimumab (0.4%). N = 216 (43.2%) patients had ≥ 1 irAEs (females: 47.4%; males: 40.5%). Severe (≥ grade 3) irAEs were reported in 13.6% of patients. The following irAE incidences were found: dermatological (15.2%), gastrointestinal (13.0%), endocrine (10.8%), musculoskeletal (4.8%), pulmonary (3.8%), systemic (3.6%), neurological (2.6%), cardiac (1.4%), renal (1.4%), hematological (0.6%), and ocular (0.2%).
conclusionNearly half of the patients experienced ≥ 1 irAEs, of which one-third severe. Females experienced more irAEs than males, above all due to a higher incidence of grade 1 irAEs. Only about half of the irAEs were reported as coded diagnosis. Further prospective studies on irAEs are warranted using structured documentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.