ArticleScientific reports2025
Investigating neural correlates of attention in relation to the development of executive functions in early childhood.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Individual variability in neural correlates of visual engagement in premature toddlers.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Most previous studies investigating early neural predictors of Executive Function (EF) abilities focused on resting-state brain activity in infancy, with mixed findings. Here, we investigated early neural predictors of later-emerging EF abilities by measuring task-related changes in brain activity, which we argue to be more sensitive to detecting individual differences in EF skills. Sixty-six 9-month-old infants participated in an action observation and execution task, while their brain activity was recorded. Two conditions were used, which required different levels of cognitive control and social engagement: one group of infants saw an experimenter performing actions in consecutive trials and then performed similar actions themselves (the Blocked condition), while the other group performed the actions, taking turns with the experimenter (the Interleaved condition). At age five, 45 of the original infants returned for follow-up assessments and completed a battery of well-established EF tasks. Of these 45 participants, 35 infants provided usable neural data at 9 months and behavioral EF data at age 5 and were included in the final analysis. Results revealed a close link between infants' neural activity and their EF abilities that were specific to frontal theta oscillations, a neural component associated with high-order cognition, and to the Interleaved condition, which was the condition that required greater attentional control and social engagement from infants. The results highlight the importance of selecting appropriate tasks and neural measures to detect longitudinal brain-behavior relations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.