Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40790129›Full record

ArticleScientific data2025

Annotated textual dataset PV600 of perovskite bandgaps for information extraction from literature.

Matilda Sipilä, Farrokh Mehryary, Sampo Pyysalo, Filip Ginter, Milica Todorović

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Matilda SipiläUniversity of Turku, Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Turku, 20014, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9076-6437
Farrokh MehryaryUniversity of Turku, TurkuNLP, Department of Computing, Turku, 20014, Finland.
Sampo PyysaloUniversity of Turku, TurkuNLP, Department of Computing, Turku, 20014, Finland.
Filip GinterUniversity of Turku, TurkuNLP, Department of Computing, Turku, 20014, Finland.
Milica TodorovićUniversity of Turku, Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Turku, 20014, Finland. milica.todorovic@utu.fi.

Funding

Academy of Finland (Suomen Akatemia) 345698
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scientific literature provides a variety of experimental and theoretical data which, if extracted, could offer new opportunities for data-driven discovery in materials research. Natural language processing (NLP) tools enable information extraction (IE) of structured information from unstructured text. The performance of IE tools needs to be systematically evaluated on manually annotated test datasets, but there are few publicly available annotated materials science datasets and none on perovskites, promising materials for photovoltaics. We present a perovskite literature dataset with 600 text segments extracted from an open access manuscript corpus. The PV600 dataset focuses on five inorganic and hybrid perovskites and contains 227 manually annotated bandgap values identified from 188 segments. Moreover, we recorded the bandgap type, whether it was experimental, computational, from the literature, or from unknown source. To demonstrate the intended use of the dataset, we applied it to evaluate the IE performance of a question answering (QA) method, a rule-based method, and generative language models (LLMs). We exhibit a further application in testing segment preselection with LLMs in IE.

Identifiers

PMID40790129
PMCPMC12339702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.