ArticleScientific reports2025
Artificial intelligence-assisted identification of condensing osteitis and idiopathic osteosclerosis on panoramic radiographs.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of Multimodal Large Language Models and Oral and Maxillofacial Radiologists in the Detection of Incidental Findings on Panoramic Radiographs: A CBCT-Referenced Diagnostic Accuracy Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Sex estimation from hand-wrist radiographic images: an artificial intelligence approach.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Idiopathic osteosclerosis (IOS) and condensing osteitis (CO) represent radiopaque lesions often detected incidentally within the jaws, posing substantial diagnostic challenges due to their overlapping radiographic characteristics. The objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic efficacy of YOLOv8 and YOLOv11 deep learning algorithms in the identification of IOS and CO lesions on panoramic radiographs. A comprehensive collection of 1,000 panoramic images was retrospectively gathered and meticulously annotated utilizing a bounding box approach by two proficient oral and maxillofacial radiologists. All images were standardized to a resolution of 640 × 640 pixels and segregated into training (70%), validation (15%), and testing (15%) subsets. The performance of the models was evaluated based on metrics including accuracy, sensitivity, precision, F1 score, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). YOLOv11 achieved notable precision scores of 98.8% for IOS and 97.1% for CO, alongside F1 scores of 96.8% and 95.6%, respectively. Conversely, YOLOv8 produced precision scores of 96.6% for IOS and 91.4% for CO, with F1 scores of 94% and 90%. These findings illustrate that AI-enhanced deep learning models possess the capability to accurately identify IOS and CO lesions, thereby presenting opportunities to improve diagnostic consistency, avert unnecessary invasive procedures, and facilitate more effective treatment planning within clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.