ArticleScientific reports2025
Understanding patient needs and preferences for joint protection in hand osteoarthritis through mixed methods patient co-design.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Co-designing a joint protection program for hand osteoarthritis: a latent-class discrete choice experiment of patient preferences.Rheumatology advances in practice · 2026Article
- Iterative usability testing of a digital joint protection program for people with hand osteoarthritis.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hand osteoarthritis (HOA) is a prevalent chronic condition that impairs quality of life and daily functioning. While joint protection programs (JPPs) offer symptom management, they remain outdated, inaccessible, and poorly tailored to patient needs. This study leverages patient co-design to develop a novel, inclusive, technology-enabled JPP. Using an explanatory sequential design, a survey of 196 participants (88% female, mean age 66 ± 8 years) identified priority activities and challenges for patients with HOA. Key activities of daily living and occupational and functional tasks were rated using a 5-point Likert scale, with a Relative Importance Index (RII) calculated for each item. Qualitative semi-structured interviews with 20 purposefully sampled participants provided in-depth insights into lived experiences with HOA and preferences in JPPs. Quantitative analysis identified high-importance tasks, such as buttoning, gripping, and twisting, with RII scores exceeding 0.8, indicating strong positive sentiment. Functional impairments included issues with precision grip and gross motor tasks, and pain interference disrupted daily activities and social roles. Qualitative themes revealed the importance of strategies for sustaining meaningful activities, patient support communities, and barriers related to accessibility, including technological literacy and caregiving responsibilities. Findings emphasize the importance of co-designing JPPs that address functional impairments, incorporate patient support communities, and consider intersectional barriers. This approach fosters accessibility, adherence, and relevance, paving the way for improved outcomes in patients with HOA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.