Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40790010›Full record

ArticleMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2025

18F-FDG PET/CT-based deep radiomic models for enhancing chemotherapy response prediction in breast cancer.

Zirui Jiang, Joshua Low, Colin Huang, Yong Yue, Christopher Njeh, Oluwaseyi Oderinde

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. [La Radiologia medica · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zirui JiangAdvanced Molecular Imaging in Radiotherapy (AdMIRe) Research Lab, School of Health Sciences, College of Health and Human Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.
Joshua LowAdvanced Molecular Imaging in Radiotherapy (AdMIRe) Research Lab, School of Health Sciences, College of Health and Human Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.
Colin HuangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Yong YueDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Christopher NjehDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Oluwaseyi OderindeAdvanced Molecular Imaging in Radiotherapy (AdMIRe) Research Lab, School of Health Sciences, College of Health and Human Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA. ooderind@purdue.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enhancing the accuracy of tumor response predictions enables the development of tailored therapeutic strategies for patients with breast cancer. In this study, we developed deep radiomic models to enhance the prediction of chemotherapy response after the first treatment cycle. 18F-Fludeoxyglucose PET/CT imaging data and clinical record from 60 breast cancer patients were retrospectively obtained from the Cancer Imaging Archive. PET/CT scans were conducted at three distinct stages of treatment; prior to the initiation of chemotherapy (T1), following the first cycle of chemotherapy (T2), and after the full chemotherapy regimen (T3). The patient's primary gross tumor volume (GTV) was delineated on PET images using a 40% threshold of the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax). Radiomic features were extracted from the GTV based on the PET/CT images. In addition, a squeeze-and-excitation network (SENet) deep learning model was employed to generate additional features from the PET/CT images for combined analysis. A XGBoost machine learning model was developed and compared with the conventional machine learning algorithm [random forest (RF), logistic regression (LR) and support vector machine (SVM)]. The performance of each model was assessed using receiver operating characteristics area under the curve (ROC AUC) analysis, and prediction accuracy in a validation cohort. Model performance was evaluated through fivefold cross-validation on the entire cohort, with data splits stratified by treatment response categories to ensure balanced representation. The AUC values for the machine learning models using only radiomic features were 0.85(XGBoost), 0.76 (RF), 0.80 (LR), and 0.59 (SVM), with XGBoost showing the best performance. After incorporating additional deep learning-derived features from SENet, the AUC values increased to 0.92, 0.88, 0.90, and 0.61, respectively, demonstrating significant improvements in predictive accuracy. Predictions were based on pre-treatment (T1) and post-first-cycle (T2) imaging data, enabling early assessment of chemotherapy response after the initial treatment cycle. Integrating deep learning-derived features significantly enhanced the performance of predictive models for chemotherapy response in breast cancer patients. This study demonstrated the superior predictive capability of the XGBoost model, emphasizing its potential to optimize personalized therapeutic strategies by accurately identifying patients unlikely to respond to chemotherapy after the first treatment cycle.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDeep LearningFluorodeoxyglucose F18Positron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyAdultAgedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRadiomicsRadiopharmaceuticalsRetrospective StudiesFluorodeoxyglucose F18RadiopharmaceuticalsBreast cancerChemotherapyPET/CT imagingRadiomics modelTreatment response

Identifiers

PMID40790010
PMCPMC12339616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.