Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40790006›Full record

SynthesisJournal of robotic surgery2025

Comparative outcomes of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) versus robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Chunlin Tan, Chunmei Wang, Jing Huang, Bo Liao, Xianzhong Deng, Anneng Hu, Yugen Li

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-AnalysisComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chunlin Tan *Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, No. 1 Mao Yuan South Road, Wenhua Road 57, Shunqing, Nanchong, 637000, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Chunmei Wang *Physical Examination Center, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, No. 1 Mao Yuan South Road, Shunqing, Nanchong, 637000, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Jing HuangDepartment of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, No. 1 Mao Yuan South Road, Wenhua Road 57, Shunqing, Nanchong, 637000, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Bo LiaoDepartment of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, No. 1 Mao Yuan South Road, Wenhua Road 57, Shunqing, Nanchong, 637000, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Xianzhong DengDepartment of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, No. 1 Mao Yuan South Road, Wenhua Road 57, Shunqing, Nanchong, 637000, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Anneng HuDepartment of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, No. 1 Mao Yuan South Road, Wenhua Road 57, Shunqing, Nanchong, 637000, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Yugen LiDepartment of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, No. 1 Mao Yuan South Road, Wenhua Road 57, Shunqing, Nanchong, 637000, Sichuan, People's Republic of China. drliyugen@sina.cn.

Funding

City and College Technology Strategic Cooperation Project of Nanchong 22SXQT0215Project of North Sichuan Medical College CBY21-QA38
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the rising prevalence of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), there is an increasing demand for surgical interventions that optimize patient outcomes while minimizing complications. This systematic review aims to critically evaluate and contrast the clinical outcomes, surgical efficiency, and safety profiles during the perioperative period for holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) and robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) in patients diagnosed with BPH exhibiting a prostate volume of ≥ 80 mL, providing evidence-based insights for BPH management. Adhering to the EAU Guidelines Office and PRISMA guidelines, the study protocol was registered with Prospero [CRD420251059418]. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in Web of Science, Embase, PubMed and Scopus up to May 10, 2025, to identify comparative studies of HoLEP and RASP in BPH patients. The methodological quality of the included studies was systematically evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), a validated tool specifically designed to assess the risk of bias in observational studies. Eleven studies involving 1772 patients (1247 HoLEP; 525 RASP) met inclusion criteria. Both techniques demonstrated comparable efficacy in functional outcomes, including maximum urinary flow rate, post-void residual volume, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), and quality of life (QoL). However, HoLEP exhibited superior efficiency metrics: Reduced estimated blood loss: 105.01 mL (p < 0.005); Shorter catheterization time: 4.36 days (p < 0.00001); Lower transfusion risk: 32% reduction (p = 0.02). Operative time and postoperative complications showed no significant differences between groups. HoLEP and RASP are equally effective for managing large prostates. HoLEP offers advantages in minimizing blood loss, catheter duration, and transfusion rates, while RASP benefits from procedural ease in robotic-equipped facilities. Optimizing outcomes requires addressing disparities in technique adoption, enhancing surgical training, and aligning with evidence-based guidelines. Future high-quality randomized trials are warranted to refine personalized decision-making for clinicians and patients.

Indexed as

Lasers, Solid-StateLaser TherapyProstatectomyProstatic HyperplasiaRobotic Surgical ProceduresHumansMaleProstateTreatment OutcomeBenign prostatic hyperplasiaRobot-assisted prostatectomyThulium laser

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.