ReviewCurrent reviews in musculoskeletal medicine2025
Regeneration or Risk? A Narrative Review of BPC-157 for Musculoskeletal Healing.
Review in Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emerging risks of health optimisation: refractory nausea associated with peptide injections reported to contain retatrutide.BMJ case reports · 2026Article
- The uncontrolled rise of performance peptides: reasons for concern and a call for scientific and regulatory action.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Article
- BPC 157 in Rodent Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury: A Critical Review of Preclinical Evidence.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Peptides in Regenerative Medicine: A Comprehensive Review of Clinical Applications in Tissue Repair and Chronic Pain Management.Current pain and headache reports · 2026Review
- Safety and Efficacy of Approved and Unapproved Peptide Therapies for Musculoskeletal Injuries and Athletic Performance.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Review
- Therapeutic peptides and proteins: Status and developments in drug delivery.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2026Review
- Article
- Review
- Unilateral Adrenalectomy, and the Stable Pentadecapeptide BPC 157 as Therapy in Rats-A Cytoprotection Approach.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- BPC-157 and Its Novel Hybrid Analogs as Inhibitors of Acetylcholinesterase.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Current State of Orthobiologics in Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis-Future Directions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Annual Banned-Substance Review 18th Edition-Analytical Approaches in Human Sports Drug Testing 2024/2025.Drug testing and analysis · 2026Review
- From Regeneration to Analgesia: The Role of BPC-157 in Tissue Repair and Pain Management.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Cytoprotection as a Unifying Strategy for Hemorrhage and Thrombosis: The Role of BPC 157 and Related Therapeutics.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Tendon, Ligament, and Muscle Injury, Osteotendinous, Myotendinous, and Muscle-to-Bone Junction Therapy Perspectives with Growth Factors and Stable Gastric Pentadecapeptide BPC 157-A Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Conventional Antiarrhythmics Class I-IV, Late INa Inhibitors, IKs Enhancers, RyR2 Stabilizers, Gap Junction Modulators, Atrial-Selective Antiarrhythmics, and Stable Gastric Pentadecapeptide BPC 157 as Useful Cytoprotective Therapy in Arrhythmias.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Challenge of Corneal Ulcer Healing: A Novel Conceptual Framework, the "Triad" of Corneal Ulcer Healing/Corneal Neovascularization/Intraocular Pressure, and Avascular Tendon Healing, for Evaluation of Corneal Ulcer Therapy, Therapy of Neovascularization, Glaucoma Therapy, and Pentadecapeptide BPC 157 Efficacy.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThis scoping review aims to evaluate the molecular mechanisms, therapeutic potential, and safety concerns of Body Protective Compound-157 (BPC-157) in the context of musculoskeletal healing. Given the compound’s increasing availability, popularity, and its regulatory controversies, we sought to assess the breadth and quality of preclinical and clinical data supporting its use in musculoskeletal medicine. RECENT
findingsBPC-157 is a synthetic pentadecapeptide originally isolated from gastric juice and has demonstrated regenerative properties across numerous animal models. It activates several overlapping pathways, notably VEGFR2 and nitric oxide synthesis via the Akt-eNOS axis, promoting angiogenesis, fibroblast activity, and neuromuscular stabilization. It also engages ERK1/2 signaling, facilitates endothelial and muscle repair, and exerts anti-inflammatory effects. These effects promote angiogenesis, fibroblast activity, and neuromuscular stabilization, particularly in poorly vascularized tissues such as tendons and myotendinous junctions. Despite broad preclinical support, human data are extremely limited. Only three pilot studies have examined BPC-157 in humans, including its use for intraarticular knee pain, interstitial cystitis, and intravenous safety/pharmacokinetics. No adverse effects were reported, but rigorous, large-scale trials are lacking. BPC-157 demonstrates robust regenerative and cytoprotective effects in preclinical studies, positioning it as a potentially valuable tool in musculoskeletal medicine. Despite its growing popularity among athletes and its wide availability through non-regulated sources, there is minimal human data available. Until well-designed clinical trials are conducted, BPC-157 should be considered investigational, and its use approached with caution. This review highlights that given the robust preclinical evidence and high public interest, there is a critical need for well-designed human trials to assess the safety, efficacy, and clinical utility of BPC-157 in musculoskeletal medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.