ArticleScientific reports2025
Strength and permeability performance of excavated waste mud stabilized with ternary industrial byproducts.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Flocculation Characteristics and Dewatering Performance of Bored Pile Waste Slurry with Different Flocculants.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To address the dual challenges of improving strength and reducing permeability in solidified soils produced from excavated waste mud, this study develops a sustainable stabilization method using industrial by-products. A ternary solid waste-based cementitious material (SWC), consisting of ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS), steel slag (SS), and desulfurization gypsum (DG), was optimized through an extreme vertex mixture design. The results demonstrate that, under appropriate mix proportions, the solidified soil using SWC can achieve comparable unconfined compressive strength (UCS) at 7 d and superior strength at 28 d compared to ordinary Portland cement (OPC). Specifically, the mixture containing 60 wt% GGBS, 30 wt% SS, and 10 wt% DG, referred to as G60S30D10, achieved a 28 d UCS of 3.22 MPa, representing an increase of approximately 105% over OPC, and a permeability coefficient of 1.94 × 10⁻⁸ m/s, an order of magnitude lower than that of OPC, which indicates excellent water resistance. Microstructural analysis, including X-ray diffraction, thermogravimetric analysis, scanning electron microscopy, and mercury intrusion porosimetry, reveals that the primary hydration products in the SWC solidified soil include ettringite (AFt), C-S-H, C-A-H, and C-A-S-H. Compared to OPC, the AFt content increased by 22-83%, and the combined action of expansive AFt crystals and dense C-(A)-S-H gels effectively fill interconnected pores, leading to a substantial reduction in detrimental macropores (> 1 μm) from 15% in OPC to 2-3% in the SWC matrix. This refined pore structure substantially contributed to the observed reduction in permeability. These findings offer valuable insights into the performance and mechanisms of low-carbon, high-efficiency solidified soils using industrial by-products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.