Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40789885›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

The metabolome of fecal extracellular vesicles in patients with malignant solid tumors.

Surbhi Mishra, Arina Maltseva, Anni I Nieminen, Mikael Niku, Sonja Karikka, Jenni Hekkala, Sirpa Leppä, Pia Vihinen, Kaisa Sunela, Jussi Koivunen and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. [Liquid Biopsy Revolutionizes the Precise Management of Tumors Across the Entire Course: Current Situation and Future Prospects].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Surbhi Mishra *Research Unit of Clinical Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland. surbhi.mishra@oulu.fi.
Arina MaltsevaDepartment of Veterinary Biosciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Anni I NieminenHelsinki Metabolomics Center, Stem Cell and Metabolism Research Program, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Mikael NikuDepartment of Veterinary Biosciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Sonja KarikkaLaboratory of Developmental Biology, Disease Networks Research Unit, Faculty of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Jenni HekkalaBiocenter Oulu, University of Oulu, Aapistie 5, P.O. Box 5281, Oulu, 90014, Finland.
Sirpa LeppäDepartment of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Pia VihinenFICAN West Cancer Centre and Department of Oncology, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Kaisa SunelaFinnish Medicines Agency, Tampere, Finland.
Jussi KoivunenDepartment of Medical Oncology and Radiotherapy and Medical Research Center, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Arja JukkolaDepartment of Oncology, Tampere Cancer Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Ilja KalashnikovDepartment of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Päivi AuvinenCancer Center, Kuopio University Hospital, Northern Savonia Healthcare Municipality, Kuopio, Finland.
Okko-Sakari KääriäinenCancer Center, Kuopio University Hospital, Northern Savonia Healthcare Municipality, Kuopio, Finland.
Juha SaarnioTranslational Medicine Research Unit, Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Sanna MeriläinenTranslational Medicine Research Unit, Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Tero RautioTranslational Medicine Research Unit, Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Raila AroTranslational Medicine Research Unit, Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Reetta HäiväläTranslational Medicine Research Unit, Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Peeter KarihtalaDepartment of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Terhi Ruuska-Loewald *Research Unit of Clinical Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Justus Reunanen *Biocenter Oulu, University of Oulu, Aapistie 5, P.O. Box 5281, Oulu, 90014, Finland.

Funding

European Regional Development Fund A76179Research Council of Finland 328768
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dysregulated metabolism, a hallmark of cancer, creates unique metabolic features that can be employed to elucidate cancer prognosis, personalized treatment, and therapeutic response. Metabolomics has emerged as a powerful tool for profiling biomarkers in cancer studies. Most cancer metabolomic research on extracellular vesicles (EVs) has focused on human biofluids as samples. The metabolome of fecal EVs, a connecting link for host-microbiome interactions in cancer, has not been extensively studied. In this controlled study, we investigated the metabolomic signatures of fecal EVs in patients with solid tumors. Fecal samples were collected from adult patients with solid tumors (n = 28) and healthy controls (n = 7). After the isolation of EVs from fecal samples, EV metabolites were identified using targeted metabolomics profiling based on liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). The metabolomic profiles of the fecal EVs from both patients and controls were compared using R and Metabolite Set Enrichment Analysis was done using Metaboanalyst 6.0. The metabolomic profiles of fecal EVs showed several differences between patients with solid tumors and control subjects. L-glutamic acid was identified as the most significantly enriched metabolite in patients with solid tumors. Conversely, guanine and N-acetylneuraminate were the most significantly depleted metabolites in the fecal EVs of these patients. Metabolite Set Enrichment Analysis linked the identified EV metabolites to key metabolic pathways, including arginine biosynthesis, glyoxylate and dicarboxylate metabolism, and the biosynthesis of branched-chain amino acids and unsaturated fatty acids. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) revealed that glutamic acid is the most effective metabolite in distinguishing cancer patients from healthy controls. Some of these metabolites may also have plausible bacterial origins, as described in previous studies. Distinct metabolic phenotypes were identified in patients with solid tumors by analyzing fecal EVs in this study. The metabolomic profiling of fecal EVs offers valuable insights into the interactions between the gut microbiome and the host as well as unique metabolic snapshot of the disease status in the context of cancer. Thus, fecal EVs should be included in advanced multi-omics analyses of cancer research, alongside other human biofluids.

Indexed as

Extracellular VesiclesFecesMetabolomeNeoplasmsAdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorCase-Control StudiesChromatography, LiquidFemaleHumansMaleMetabolomicsMiddle AgedBiomarkers, TumorCancer, Small-molecule metabolitesExtracellular vesiclesGut microbiomeMass spectrometryMetabolome

Identifiers

PMID40789885
PMCPMC12340066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.