ArticleScientific reports2025
Pulse pressure after thrombectomy predicts functional outcomes and mortality in acute ischemic stroke with large artery occlusion.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of Intraprocedural Pulse Pressure During Mechanical Thrombectomy on Functional and Radiological Outcomes in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Post-Thrombectomy Pulse Pressure Trajectories and Outcomes in Middle-Aged and Older Stroke Patients.Clinical interventions in aging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Post-procedure blood pressure (BP) strongly influences the prognosis of ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusion. However, no consensus or guidelines currently exist regarding BP targets and management after endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). Although several recent clinical trials have investigated BP management after EVT, their conclusions were inconsistent and contradictory. In this study, we systematically analyzed 12 post-procedure BP parameters from 826 acute ischemic stroke patients within 24 h after EVT; 587 cases were included in the final analysis. We utilized multivariate logistic regression to identify predictors of poor prognosis and mortality after EVT. Restrictive cubic splines were used to evaluate dose-response relationships of mean pulse pressure (PP) with clinical outcomes. Subgroup analyses were conducted to assess the predictive performance of mean PP across patient subgroups. Mean PP demonstrated statistically significant positive dose-response relationships with poor functional outcomes, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and mortality after EVT. Elevated mean PP (> 57.39 mmHg) was a stronger predictor of adverse outcomes relative to systolic or diastolic BP alone; it exhibited the highest adjusted odds ratio (aORs 2.39; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.58-3.62) and area under the curve (AUC = 0.661; 95% CI 0.617-0.705). Mean PP exhibited linear relationships with all other outcome events except mortality at 12 months after EVT. Mean PP within 24 h after EVT is an independent risk factor for sICH, poor functional outcomes, and mortality in stroke patients. BP management strategies should prioritize reducing systolic BP and stabilizing PP fluctuations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.