ArticleScientific reports2025
Bioinformatic screen with clinical validation for the identification of novel stool based mRNA biomarkers for the detection of colorectal lesions including advanced adenoma.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Messenger RNA (mRNA) stool based biomarkers represent a promising approach for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) and advanced adenoma (AA). But it is unclear which mRNA biomarkers have the most clinical utility. This study aims to partially fill this gap by performing an analysis which first ranks genes based on their expression profile in publicly available RNA-seq tissue datasets. Each gene was ranked based on observed differential expression across the majority of tumors as well as the level of expression in tumor tissue. Those genes with strong differential expression across the majority of tumors that were also highly expressed would have a higher ranking. The top 20 genes as ranked in the bioinformatic analysis of tumor and normal colon tissue gene expression were then tested on 114 clinical stool samples (CRC N = 33, AA N = 28, Controls N = 53). Fourteen of the genes had significant differential expression in the stool of CRC patients compared to controls (false discovery rate or FDR < 0.05). The Pearson correlation coefficient between tissue and stool expression was 0.57 (p-value = 0.007). The combined performance of the 20 genes in clinical stool samples had an area under the receiver operator curve (AUC) of 0.94 for CRC detection (sensitivity 75.5%, specificity 95%) and an AUC of 0.83 (sensitivity 55.8%, specificity 92.6%) for AA detection. The ability to use existing public transcriptomic datasets to identify promising candidate genes can substantially reduce the cost and effort required to screen for clinically useful mRNA biomarkers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.