Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40789833›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2025

Validation of computational models simulating injury-related kinematics with muscle activation - obtaining data under general anaesthesia.

Lea Siebler, Sarah Thaler, Julia Muehlbauer, Steffen Peldschus, Philipp Groene, Sylvia Schick, Simon T Schaefer

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lea Siebler *Biomechanics and Accident Analysis, University of Munich LMU, Munich, Germany. l.siebler@lmu.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2621-5769
Sarah Thaler *Clinic for Anaesthesiology, University of Munich LMU, Munich, Germany.
Julia MuehlbauerBiomechanics and Accident Analysis, University of Munich LMU, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3165-5144
Steffen PeldschusBiomechanics and Accident Analysis, University of Munich LMU, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0921-434X
Philipp GroeneClinic for Anaesthesiology, University of Munich LMU, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8357-5552
Sylvia Schick *Biomechanics and Accident Analysis, University of Munich LMU, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5631-328X
Simon T Schaefer *Clinic for Anaesthesiology, University of Munich LMU, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reconstructing injury-related movements and reactions in forensic biomechanics (e.g. abusive head trauma, whiplash, or falls) requires biofidelic representations of the human body. Muscle tone and activity can be integrated into these computational human body models. However, obtaining high-quality data on passive joint behaviour, which is crucial for ensuring accurate simulation results, remains challenging. A challenge in volunteer experiments is the high kinematic variability affecting passive responses. This study investigates differences in gravity-induced knee flexion between anaesthetised and awake subjects, aiming to clarify how muscle tone influences passive behaviour. Knee flexion kinematics and vastus lateralis activity were measured in eleven patients scheduled for surgery. Three tests were performed while patients were awake, two following propofol sedation, and three after administering a muscle relaxant. In awake trials, median duration to reach 47° knee flexion was 404 ms, compared to 355 ms for anaesthetised and 349 ms for anaesthetised + relaxed. Significant differences were found between anaesthetised + relaxed (p = < 0.001) and between anaesthetised + relaxed versus anaesthetised (p = 0.004). Only 15% of awake trials showed no measurable muscular activity. The results indicate significant muscle tension that cannot be detected by EMG and cannot be suppressed in awake patients. This study explores the differences in gravity-induced knee flexion between anaesthetised and awake subjects, focusing on how muscle tone impacts passive responses amidst the challenges of high kinematic variability. This study offers reference data for future validation and shows how involuntary activity in non-anaesthetised subjects can enhance computational models for addressing scenarios like abusive head trauma or falls.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, GeneralComputer SimulationKnee JointModels, BiologicalAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaElectromyographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMuscle TonusPropofolRange of Motion, ArticularYoung AdultPropofolGeneral anaesthesiaKnee flexion testPassive kinematicsRelaxationValidation experiments

Identifiers

PMID40789833
PMCPMC12532759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.