ArticleDiscover oncology2025
Proteomic insights into early pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma biology and screening.
Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Very early recurrence in pancreatic cancer: Redefining prognostic markers and surveillance strategies.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) presents significant diagnostic challenges at early stages due to the absence of specific symptoms and the rapid progression of the disease. Consequently, there is an urgent imperative to investigate the mechanisms underlying early detection and the biological processes that drive cancer progression. In response to this need, we conducted a paired design study employing differential protein analysis, Mendelian randomization (MR), and single-cell analysis to identify distinctive features associated with early-stage PDAC (E-PDAC). Our initial analysis in the RJ cohort identified 1,068 E-PDAC-related proteins from differential protein analysis. Subsequently, we employed a random forest approach to pinpoint 25 E-PDAC-specific proteins. These proteins informed the development of 13 machine learning models aimed at predicting E-PDAC risk, which demonstrated an area under the curve (AUC) of approximately 0.9 in the discovery cohort and approximately 0.8 in external validation. Furthermore, MR and single-cell analysis were utilized to explore causal relationships and the composition of the tumor microenvironment. Through MR, we identified STX7 as a risk factor (odds ratio = 1.26; confidence interval: 1.03-1.54; p = 0.02), with LUM exhibiting a dual role (pro-tumorigenic in proteomic analysis but anti-tumorigenic in MR analysis). Single-cell analysis revealed that LUM primarily aids in the generation of fibroblasts and T/B cells, serving as pro-tumorigenic and antitumorigenic agents, respectively. Our research offers valuable insights into protein biomarkers, cell types, and communication in E-PDAC, suggesting potential targets to improve screening efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.