ArticleBMJ open2025
Effects of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation on sepsis-induced coagulopathy: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Neuroimmune Axis in Sepsis: From Pathophysiological Circuits to Precision Neuromodulation.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Review
- Brain-Region-Mediated Neuroimmune Modulation in Sepsis: Research Advances and Therapeutic Prospects.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) is an early-stage coagulation disorder associated with increased morbidity and mortality in sepsis. It reflects a dysregulated host response and is considered a precursor to disseminated intravascular coagulation and multi-organ failure. Currently, there is no specific treatment for SIC beyond supportive care. Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation technique that has shown potential in regulating inflammation and coagulation pathways. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of taVNS in improving coagulation dysfunction in patients with SIC, with the primary outcome being the proportion of patients achieving a ≥2-point improvement in SIC score by day 7. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a single-centre, randomised, sham-controlled, single-blind clinical trial designed to evaluate the efficacy of taVNS in patients with SIC. This study will enrol 184 adult patients who meet the diagnostic criteria for SIC. Participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either active taVNS or sham stimulation for 7 consecutive days. The intervention will be applied twice daily for 7 consecutive days using standardised stimulation parameters (25 Hz, 3 mA, 60 min/session). The primary outcome is the proportion of patients achieving an improvement of ≥2 points in SIC score from baseline to day 7. Secondary outcomes include platelet count, international normalised ratio, activated partial thromboplastin time, D-dimer, fibrinogen, procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, angiopoietin-2, systemic immune-inflammation index, lactic acid, duration of antibiotic therapy, length of hospital stay and 28-day all-cause mortality. Adverse events and protocol adherence will also be recorded. Data will be analysed using intention-to-treat principles. Between-group comparisons for the primary outcome will be performed using X ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Yancheng Third People's Hospital (approval No. 2023-058-01). The trial has been registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2400082378). Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and academic conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2400082378.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.