ArticleBMJ global health2025
Emergency preparedness and health system resilience assessment tool: development and initial validation.
Article in BMJ global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Challenges That Health Care Systems Faced During and After the COVID-19 Pandemic.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMiddle East and North Africa (MENA) region has been one of the most significantly impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. The escalating frequency and complexity of global health threats-from pandemics like COVID-19 to climate change-induced emergencies-have elevated the imperative for stronger and more resilient health systems in the MENA region and the world over. In this paper, we introduce a tool designed to offer a comprehensive and engaging approach to assessing health system resilience and emergency preparedness and response capabilities, and articulate the tool's value add in the MENA region.
methodsWe developed the tool following a three-step approach consisting of (1) definition of purpose and scope of tool, (2) item generation and reduction and (3) testing for content and face validity given the MENA region's context. The Health System Resiliency Analysis Framework was adapted as the guiding framework for tool development.
resultsThe tool offers a comprehensive and adaptable approach to self-assessment of health system resilience, using a multisectoral platform that enables continuous learning and improvement. The novelty of the tool resides in its potential to yield practical priority actions that need to be considered at all levels. The current version of the tool includes five components: (1) financing arrangements; (2) governance arrangements; (3) health system resources, public health and service delivery; (4) data and information systems; and (5) political and socioeconomic context. Each of the components consists of various subcomponents (22 in total). Each subcomponent is assessed using a mix of quantitative and qualitative indicators (99 indicators in total). On that basis, each subcomponent is scored to reflect the maturity of the country's capacity in that specific area.
conclusionThe proposed tool will address the limitations of the existing assessment instruments. We invite others to contribute with additional real-life implementation of the tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.