ArticleJournal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM2025
Balancing Access, Well-Being, and Collaboration When Considering Hybrid Care Delivery Models in Primary Care Practices with Team-Based Care.
Article in Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feasibility Assessment of Telehealth-Based Cancer Pain Management Through Machine Learning: A Prospective Clinical Study.Pain research & management · 2026Article
- Can multidisciplinary teams improve the quality of primary care? A scoping review.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Review
- The 4Cs of Primary Care, Leveraging Artificial Intelligence, and Improving Clinical Practice.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHybrid models of care (ie, telehealth and in-person care delivery options) have been incorporated into primary care clinics to increase patient access to care. We examine the effects of these approaches on the work experiences and wellness of primary care clinical team members providing team-based care to patients.
methodsIn this qualitative study, we conducted semistructured interviews with clinical team members (primary care clinicians, behavioral health consultants, registered nurse) at 2 primary care practices at 2 time points (late 2021-mid 2022 (n = 14); midlate 2023 (n = 11)). We used an inductive approach to analyze data. KEY
resultsBenefits of hybrid models of care included increased patient access and personal flexibility; however, it was noted that the fragmented in-clinic schedules that emerged from the hybrid model resulted in reduced in-clinic interactions. This led to less information sharing among team members and a degradation of informal support networks that could adversely impact patient care. To mitigate these challenges, many preferred that most of their clinical shifts occurred in-person, in the clinic, with 1 to 2 sessions per week for in-home (telework) shifts.
conclusionsIn team-based primary care clinics, hybrid care models can impact interactions among clinical team members and shape the day-to-day environment in which clinical teams work. To optimize hybrid care approaches in the primary care setting, organization leaders must consider the impact of hybrid care models on clinic and team culture, and the well-being of clinical team members.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.