ArticleJournal of applied biomechanics2025
Reliability of a Lower-Extremity Shear Force Control Task in Young, Uninjured Adults.
Article in Journal of applied biomechanics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A novel shear force control task has previously been shown to elucidate different neuromuscular control strategies among individuals after anterior cruciate ligament injury, individuals following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, uninjured collegiate athletes, and uninjured recreational athletes. However, the reliability of the methodology has not been evaluated. The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability of this methodology in a population with no lower-extremity injury. Thirteen individuals (7 men, 24.7 [4.8] y, body mass index: 23.9 [3.6] kg/m2) completed a standing force control task in the medial/lateral and anterior/posterior directions for each leg on 2 separate occasions (1 wk apart). Intraclass correlation coefficient with 95% confidence intervals, standard error of measurement, and minimum detectable change were calculated to assess the reliability of largest Lyapunov exponent values. Intraclass correlation coefficient values across all measures were good to excellent (r = .78-.92). Reliability was highest in the medial/lateral direction at the right lower extremity (r = .92; 95% confidence interval, .75-.98, P = .025). The shear force control task exhibited good to excellent reliability across measures, suggesting that it can reliably measure force control variability. This methodology may provide insight into neuromuscular control strategies following injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.