Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40789293›Full record

ReviewArchivos de cardiologia de Mexico2025

[Prone position in acute respiratory distress syndrome after open-heart surgery].

Martín S Markov

Abstract readReviewEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Review in Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Martín S MarkovServicio de Kinesiología y Rehabilitación, Hospital El Cruce, Florencio Varela, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is one of the main causes of postoperative respiratory failure, associated with a high mortality rate in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Although there is robust evidence regarding the benefits of the prone position maneuver in terms of oxygenation, ventilatory mechanics, and mortality, it is not free of complications, and therefore of relative and absolute contraindications. A review of the literature was carried out regarding the safety and efficacy of the prone position maneuver in patients after recent cardiac surgery with median sternotomy who develop ARDS under invasive mechanical ventilation. It is concluded that, in an appropriate setting, with experienced personnel and necessary care, the prone position could be safe in this type of patients. Studies of higher methodological quality and with better discrimination of the reason for refractory hypoxemia are needed to determine the efficacy in patients who develop ARDS after cardiac surgery with median sternotomy in terms of in-hospital mortality.

Indexed as

Cardiac Surgical ProceduresPatient PositioningPostoperative ComplicationsRespiratory Distress SyndromeHumansProne PositionCardiac surgeryProne positionRespiratory distress syndrome

Identifiers

PMID40789293
PMCPMC12631949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.