ReviewArchivos de cardiologia de Mexico2025
[Prone position in acute respiratory distress syndrome after open-heart surgery].
Review in Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is one of the main causes of postoperative respiratory failure, associated with a high mortality rate in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Although there is robust evidence regarding the benefits of the prone position maneuver in terms of oxygenation, ventilatory mechanics, and mortality, it is not free of complications, and therefore of relative and absolute contraindications. A review of the literature was carried out regarding the safety and efficacy of the prone position maneuver in patients after recent cardiac surgery with median sternotomy who develop ARDS under invasive mechanical ventilation. It is concluded that, in an appropriate setting, with experienced personnel and necessary care, the prone position could be safe in this type of patients. Studies of higher methodological quality and with better discrimination of the reason for refractory hypoxemia are needed to determine the efficacy in patients who develop ARDS after cardiac surgery with median sternotomy in terms of in-hospital mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.