Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40789226›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2025

Capacity enhancement on biosecurity for line supervisors working in commercial broiler farming Gujarat.

Binal Prajapati, Akash Golaviya, Khushbu Rana, Prakash Koringa, Fiona Tomley, Ayona Silva-Fletcher, Haidaruliman Paleja

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Binal PrajapatiDepartment of Veterinary Biotechnology, College of Veterinary Science & Animal Husbandry, Kamdhenu University, Anand, Gujarat 388001, India.
Akash GolaviyaKamdhenu University, Anand, Gujarat 388001, India.
Khushbu RanaKamdhenu University, Anand, Gujarat 388001, India.
Prakash KoringaDepartment of Veterinary Biotechnology, College of Veterinary Science & Animal Husbandry, Kamdhenu University, Anand, Gujarat 388001, India. Electronic address: pgkoringa@kamdhenuuni.edu.in.
Fiona TomleyRoyal Veterinary College, London NW1 0TU, United Kingdom.
Ayona Silva-FletcherRoyal Veterinary College, London NW1 0TU, United Kingdom.
Haidaruliman PalejaDepartment of Veterinary Biotechnology, College of Veterinary Science & Animal Husbandry, Kamdhenu University, Anand, Gujarat 388001, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Poultry farming in Gujarat faces persistent challenges from infectious diseases, foodborne pathogens, and the growing threat of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), necessitating the adoption of stringent biosecurity measures encompassing isolation, traffic control, and sanitation. The study aimed to evaluate the knowledge and effectiveness of biosecurity practices among line supervisors involved in contractual commercial broiler farming in Gujarat. This study evaluated the socio-economic characteristics and biosecurity knowledge of 33 line supervisors through a one-day capacity-building training program. Pre- and post-training assessments, including structured questionnaires and Likert scales, were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and Factor Analysis of Mixed Data (FAMD) in R (v4.0.2). Results revealed that most participants were young (mean age 33.94), married males with higher secondary or graduate education and over a decade of poultry farming experience. Post-training evaluations showed a significant improvement in biosecurity knowledge and practices, with 75.76 % rating the training as excellent and was recognized as useful by 90.91 % of respondents. Furthermore, for the non-implementation of comprehensive biosecurity measures by the farmers, lack of awareness was the major attribute given by line supervisors (57.58 %) for the farmers, followed by inadequate control (51.52 %) and insufficient knowledge (48.48 %). Additionally, FAMD identified 76 epidemiological points across breeding farms, commercial broiler farms, and markets, offering insights into zoonotic risk and poultry distribution network (PDN) structure. The findings investigated the need for structured training and advisory support, along with government-led financial incentives, to strengthen biosecurity implementation in poultry systems.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryBiosecurityChickensFarmersHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePoultry DiseasesAdultAnimalsFemaleHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesBiosecurityBroiler farmLine supervisorMitigationTraining

Identifiers

PMID40789226
PMCPMC12357087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.